Reputation: 3207
Imagine I have following markup
<div class="container">
<div class="item"></div>
<div class="item"></div>
<div class="item"></div>
<div class="item"></div>
</div>
and style
.item {
width: 100%
}
and due to certain reasons I can't change the width of the
.item
Can I arrange 2 items in each row by styling parent container .container
, using flexbox or any other way?
Upvotes: 145
Views: 358856
Reputation: 60543
You can give flex: 50%
to children div
s without touching .item
.item {
width: 100%
}
.container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.container > div {
flex: 50%; /* or - flex: 0 50% - or - flex-basis: 50% - */
/*demo*/
box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px black;
margin-bottom: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
</div>
Upvotes: 308
Reputation: 712
The below solution worked for me
.parent{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.child{
width: 25%;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
Sample: https://codepen.io/capynet/pen/WOPBBm
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 2209
Assuming that the width property must not be changed, I can think of a few possible solutions, the first being fit-content
which has amazingly poor browser support. The second, is use positioning, which is an equally bad idea due to its finicky nature and likelihood to fail on different screen sizes.
Now the last two, are very similar, one is to use two containers, give them display:inline;
give them a limited width, and fill them with items. If you didn't notice, this is essentially a 2×1 table.
Lastly you could make a 2×1 table, and while it is probably the easiest solution here, it is a bad idea to get in the habit of using tables to position things other than forms and tables. However, it is an option that I will make available to you.
Good luck!
Upvotes: 0