Reputation: 1917
I am getting different output of df -h for swap memory (/tmp filesystem) on Solaris 10 server at different times. I could not find much on the actual reason, and also I am confused how can it be so?
I am getting these outputs at different times.
1) w0110Da04 ins /apps/ins> df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 9.9G 1.5G 8.3G 16% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 508M 1.0M 507M 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3 20G 4.2G 15G 22% /usr
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1
20G 4.2G 15G 22% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s4 20G 7.3G 12G 38% /var
***swap 578M 71M 507M 13% /tmp***
swap 507M 32K 507M 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 135G 101G 33G 76% /int01
/dev/dsk/c1t2d0s0 135G 6.9G 126G 6% /int02
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5 20G 637M 19G 4% /apps
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s6 15G 7.4G 7.2G 51% /export/home
LDAP 244G 57G 187G 24% /LDAP
Here, /tmp has total size 578 MB. But in the second output below, I have:
2) root@***w0110Da04*** # df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s0 9.9G 1.5G 8.3G 16% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
proc 0K 0K 0K 0% /proc
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/mnttab
swap 28G 1.0M 28G 1% /etc/svc/volatile
objfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/object
sharefs 0K 0K 0K 0% /etc/dfs/sharetab
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s3 20G 4.2G 15G 22% /usr
/usr/lib/libc/libc_hwcap2.so.1
20G 4.2G 15G 22% /lib/libc.so.1
fd 0K 0K 0K 0% /dev/fd
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s4 20G 7.3G 12G 38% /var
***swap 29G 707M 28G 3% /tmp***
swap 28G 36K 28G 1% /var/run
/dev/dsk/c1t1d0s0 135G 103G 30G 78% /int01
/dev/dsk/c1t2d0s0 135G 6.9G 126G 6% /int02
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s5 20G 637M 19G 4% /apps
/dev/dsk/c1t0d0s6 15G 7.4G 7.2G 51% /export/home
LDAP 244G 56G 188G 23% /LDAP
Here, /tmp has 29GB as total size.
Both are swap memories, So how is there so much size difference for the same server but at different times and that too for total swap size?
Please help.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 210