CODEWITHSUNDEEP
clinuxmultithreadingpopen
Arkaik
Arkaik

Reputation: 902

Wait for popen script to terminate in C

Is that possible with C to wait until the popen subprocess is finished?

I have a script launched by a C daemon which will connect to a wifi network when an external signal is triggered.

Here is my code for now :

********************* Wait for external event here ***********************

if((fp = popen(CONNECTION_SCRIPT, "r")) == NULL)
{
    SYSLOG_ERR("[Error] Impossible to open pipe to execute  %s\n", CONNECTION_SCRIPT);
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

while(fgets(scriptBuffer, SCRIPT_BUF_SIZE, fp) != NULL)
{
    SYSLOG("[%s] %s", CONNECTION_SCRIPT, scriptBuffer);
}

if(pclose(fp))
{
    SYSLOG_ERR("[Error] Error with %s execution \n", CONNECTION_SCRIPT);
    exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}

However, I'm not waiting for the subprocess to finish so when I'm closing the pipe, the ressource is busy because the script is stil writting in. Is there a way to wait for the end of the connection script before reading in the pipe and closing it?

I know I could do it by forking the process and waiting for the child to terminate but it's quite a lot of modifications just to synchronize threads

Upvotes: 3

Views: 5166

Answers (1)

rici
rici

Reputation: 241701

I'm guessing that you say that you get a "resource busy" error because errno has the value EBUSY when you log the error in the third last line of your snippet. That may well be misleading.

In general, you should only check the value of errno if you have a solid indication that an error occurred. In the case of pclose, that indication would be that the function returns precisely -1 (and not any non-zero value, as is the case with your current code).

Any value other than -1 returned by pclose should be interpreted as the subprocess's termination code; in such a case, errno will have an unspecified (and therefore misleading) value. You can use the WEXITSTATUS, WIFSIGNALED and WTERMSIG macros as explained in the waitpid manpage to interpret the return value from pclose.

As documented in its manpage, pclose waits for the subprocess to terminate, so it already does what you request. It will return an actual error indication (-1) if its use of waitpid returns an error (unlikely, but anything is possible).

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions