Reputation: 8411
what is the complexity of the following c Function ?
double foo (int n) {
int i;
double sum;
if (n==0) return 1.0;
else {
sum = 0.0;
for (i =0; i<n; i++)
sum +=foo(i);
return sum;
}
}
Please don't just post the complexity can you help me in understanding how to go about it .
EDIT: It was an objective question asked in an exam and the Options provided were 1.O(1) 2.O(n) 3.O(n!) 4.O(n^n)
Upvotes: 4
Views: 2663
Reputation: 22555
It's Θ(2^n) ( by assuming f is a running time of algorithm we have):
f(n) = f(n-1) + f(n-2) + ... + 1
f(n-1) = f(n-2) + f(n-3) + ...
==> f(n) = 2*f(n-1), f(0) = 1
==> f(n) is in O(2^n)
Actually if we ignore the constant operations, the exact running time is 2n.
Also in the case you wrote this is an exam, both O(n!) and O(n^n) are true and nearest answer to Θ(2^n) among them is O(n!), but if I was student, I'll mark both of them :)
Explanation on O(n!):
for all n >= 1: n! = n(n-1)...*2*1 >= 2*2*2*...*2 = 2^(n-1) ==>
2 * n! >= 2^n ==> 2^n is in O(n!),
Also n! <= n^n for all n >= 1 so n! is in O(n^n)
So O(n!) in your question is nearest acceptable bound to Theta(2^n)
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 27201
You could have been a bit more clearer... grumble grumble
<n = ?> : <return value> : <number of times called>
n = 0 : 1 : 1
n = 1 : 1 : 2
n = 2 : 2 : 4
n = 3 : 4 : 8
n = 4 : 8 : 16
n = 5 : 16 : 32
n = 6 : 32 : 64
n = 7 : 64 : 128
n = 8 : 128 : 256
n = 9 : 256 : 512
n = 10 : 512 : 1024
number_of_times_called = pow(2, n-1);
Let's try putting in inputs, shall we?
Using this code:
#include <iostream>
double foo (int n) {
int i;
double sum;
if (n==0) return 1.0;
else {
sum = 0.0;
for (i =0; i<n; i++)
sum +=foo(i);
return sum;
}
}
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
for(int n = 0; 1; n++)
{
std::cout << "n = " << n << " : " << foo(n);
std::cin.ignore();
}
return(0);
}
We get:
n = 0 : 1
n = 1 : 1
n = 2 : 2
n = 3 : 4
n = 4 : 8
n = 5 : 16
n = 6 : 32
n = 7 : 64
n = 8 : 128
n = 9 : 256
n = 10 : 512
Therefore, it can be simplified to:
double foo(int n)
{
return((double)pow(2, n));
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1388
For one, it is poorly coded :)
double foo (int n) { // foo return a double, and takes an integer parameter
int i; // declare an integer variable i, that is used as a counter below
double sum; // this is the value that is returned
if (n==0) return 1.0; // if someone called foo(0), this function returns 1.0
else { // if n != 0
sum = 0.0; // set sum to 0
for (i =0; i<n; i++) // recursively call this function n times, then add it to the result
sum +=foo(i);
return sum; // return the result
}
}
You're calling foo() a total of something like n^n (where you round n down to the nearest integer)
e.g.:
foo(3)will be called 3^3 times.
Good luck, and merry Christmas.
EDIT: oops, just corrected something. Why does foo return a double? It will always return an integer, not a double.
Here would be a better version, with micro-optimizations! :D
int foo(int n)
{
if(n==0) return 1;
else{
int sum = 0;
for(int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
sum += foo(i);
return sum;
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 80031
The function is composed of multiple parts.
The first bit of complexity is the if(n==0)return 1.0;
, since that only generates one run. That would be O(1)
.
The next part is the for(i=0; i<n; i++)
loop. Since that loops from 0..n
it is O(n)
Than there is the recursion, for every number in n
you run the function again. And in that function again the loop, and the next function. And so on...
To figure out what it will be I recommend you add a global ounter inside of the loop so you can see how many times it is executed for a certain number.
Upvotes: 0