Reputation: 243
Representative sample data (list of lists):
l <- list(structure(list(a = -1.54676469632688, b = "s", c = "T",
d = structure(list(id = 5L, label = "Utah", link = "Asia/Anadyr",
score = -0.21104594634643), .Names = c("id", "label",
"link", "score")), e = 49.1279871269422), .Names = c("a",
"b", "c", "d", "e")), structure(list(a = -0.934821052832427,
b = "k", c = "T", d = list(structure(list(id = 8L, label = "South Carolina",
link = "Pacific/Wallis", score = 0.526540892113734, externalId = -6.74354377676955), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), structure(list(
id = 9L, label = "Nebraska", link = "America/Scoresbysund",
score = 0.250895465294041, externalId = 16.4257470807879), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId"))), e = 52.3161400117052), .Names = c("a",
"b", "c", "d", "e")), structure(list(a = -0.27261485993069, b = "f",
c = "P", d = list(structure(list(id = 8L, label = "Georgia",
link = "America/Nome", score = 0.526494135483816, externalId = 7.91583574935589), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), structure(list(
id = 2L, label = "Washington", link = "America/Shiprock",
score = -0.555186440792989, externalId = 15.0686663219837), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), structure(list(
id = 6L, label = "North Dakota", link = "Universal",
score = 1.03168296038975), .Names = c("id", "label",
"link", "score")), structure(list(id = 1L, label = "New Hampshire",
link = "America/Cordoba", score = 1.21582056168681, externalId = 9.7276418869132), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), structure(list(
id = 1L, label = "Alaska", link = "Asia/Istanbul", score = -0.23183264861979), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score")), structure(list(id = 4L, label = "Pennsylvania",
link = "Africa/Dar_es_Salaam", score = 0.590245339334121), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score"))), e = 132.1153538536), .Names = c("a",
"b", "c", "d", "e")), structure(list(a = 0.202685974077313, b = "x",
c = "O", d = structure(list(id = 3L, label = "Delaware",
link = "Asia/Samarkand", score = 0.695577130634724, externalId = 15.2364820698193), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), e = 97.9908914452971), .Names = c("a",
"b", "c", "d", "e")), structure(list(a = -0.396243444741009,
b = "z", c = "P", d = list(structure(list(id = 4L, label = "North Dakota",
link = "America/Tortola", score = 1.03060272795705, externalId = -7.21666936522344), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId")), structure(list(
id = 9L, label = "Nebraska", link = "America/Ojinaga",
score = -1.11397997280413, externalId = -8.45145052697411), .Names = c("id",
"label", "link", "score", "externalId"))), e = 123.597945533926), .Names = c("a",
"b", "c", "d", "e")))
I have a list of lists, by virtue of a JSON data download.
The list has 176 elements, each with 33 nested elements some of which are also lists of varying length.
I am interested in analyzing the data contained in a particular nested list, which has a length of ~150 for each of the 176 which has either 4 or 5 elements -- some have 4 and some have 5. I am trying to extract this nested list of interest and convert it into a data.frame
to be able to perform some analysis.
In the representative sample data above, I am interested in the nested list d
for each of the 5 elements of l
. The desired data.frame
would therefore look something like:
id label link score externalId
5 Utah Asia/Anadyr -0.2110459 NA
8 South Carolina Pacific/Wallis 0.5265409 -6.743544
.
.
I've been attempting to use purrr
which appears to have a sensible and consistent flow for processing data in lists, but I am running into errors that I can't fully understand the cause of -- could very well be that I don't properly understand the commands/logic of purrr
or lists (likely both). This is the code I've been attempting but throws the associated error:
df <- map_df(l, "d", ~as.data.frame(.))
Error: incompatible sizes (5 != 4)
I believe this has to do with the differing lengths of d
for each component, or perhaps the differing contained data (sometimes 4 elements sometimes 5) or perhaps the function I've used here is misspecified -- truthfully I'm not entirely sure.
I have worked around this by using a for loop, which I know is inefficient and hence my question here on SO.
This is the for loop I currently employ:
df <- data.frame(id = integer(), label = character(), score = numeric(), externalId = numeric())
for(i in seq_along(l)){
df_temp <- l[[i]][[4]] %>% map_df(~as.data.frame(.))
df <- rbind(df, df_temp)
}
Some assistance preferably with purrr
- alternatively some version of apply
as this is still superior to my for-loop - would be greatly appreciated. Also if there's a resource for the above I'd like to understand rather than just find the right code.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3745
Reputation: 36114
You can do this in three steps, first pulling out d
, then binding the rows within each element of d
, and then binding everything into a single object.
I use bind_rows
from dplyr for the within-list row binding. map_df
does the final row binding.
library(purrr)
library(dplyr)
l %>%
map("d") %>%
map_df(bind_rows)
This is also equivalent:
map_df(l, ~bind_rows(.x[["d"]] ) )
The result looks like:
# A tibble: 12 x 5
id label link score externalId
<int> <chr> <chr> <dbl> <dbl>
1 5 Utah Asia/Anadyr -0.2110459 NA
2 8 South Carolina Pacific/Wallis 0.5265409 -6.743544
3 9 Nebraska America/Scoresbysund 0.2508955 16.425747
4 8 Georgia America/Nome 0.5264941 7.915836
5 2 Washington America/Shiprock -0.5551864 15.068666
6 6 North Dakota Universal 1.0316830 NA
7 1 New Hampshire America/Cordoba 1.2158206 9.727642
8 1 Alaska Asia/Istanbul -0.2318326 NA
9 4 Pennsylvania Africa/Dar_es_Salaam 0.5902453 NA
10 3 Delaware Asia/Samarkand 0.6955771 15.236482
11 4 North Dakota America/Tortola 1.0306027 -7.216669
12 9 Nebraska America/Ojinaga -1.1139800 -8.451451
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 1494
For more information on purrr, I recommend Grolemund and Wickham's "R for Data Science" http://r4ds.had.co.nz/
I think one issue you are facing is that some of the items in l$d
are lists of variables with one observation each, ready to be converted to data frames, while other items are lists of such lists.
But I'm not that good at purrr myself. Here's how I would do it:
l <- lapply(l, function(x){x$d}) ## work with the data you need.
list_of_observations <- Filter(function(x) {!is.null(names(x))},l)
list_of_lists <- Filter(function(x) {is.null(names(x))}, l)
another_list_of_observations <- unlist(list_of_lists, recursive=FALSE)
df <- lapply(c(list_of_observations, another_list_of_observations),
as.data.frame) %>% bind_rows
Upvotes: 0