CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++operators
DDMC
DDMC

Reputation: 393

About the C++ overloaded operators

Running the program below on my computer

#include <iostream>

class Int {
public:
  Int(int x) : val{x} {}
  Int operator++() {
    std::cout << "Int::operator++()\n";
    return ++val;
  }
  friend Int operator+(Int a, Int b) {
    std::cout << "operator+(Int, Int)\n";
    return a.val + b.val;
  }
  friend Int operator*(Int a, Int b) {
    std::cout << "operator*(Int, Int)\n";
    return a.val * b.val;
  }

private:
  int val;
};

int main()
{
  Int a = 1, b = 2;
  b = ++a + b * b;
  return 0;
}

I got this output:

operator*(Int, Int)
Int::operator++()
operator+(Int, Int)

As far as I known, the prefix ++ has higher precedence than binary *. But in the output shown above, the prefix ++ is called after the binary *! Is it because the compiler treats the operator+ as a function call (which leads to Unspecified Behavior)? Can I always consider an overloaded operator as a function (which makes the behavior of x = x++ well-defined when x is an Int)?

Thanks!

Upvotes: 3

Views: 88

Answers (2)

Rakete1111
Rakete1111

Reputation: 48938

Is it because the compiler treats the operator+ as a function call (which leads to Unspecified Behavior)?

Yes. But note that it doesn't matter if ++a is evaluated after b * b, because in the end, those two are added correctly, which respects operator precedence rules.

Your expression without the assignment is equivalent to:

operator+(a.operator++(), operator*(b, b))

The order of evaluation of function arguments is unspecified, so technically, ++a can be evaluated before b * b, but also the other way around.

Can I always consider an overloaded operator as a function (which makes the behavior of x = x++ well-defined when x is an Int)?

Yes and no. If Int does the same thing as the "normal" operators would do, then no (until C++17), because that would be undefined behavior. But if Int doesn't change x in x++ for example, then yes.

Upvotes: 5

user0042
user0042

Reputation: 8018

As far as I known, the prefix ++ has higher precedence than binary *.

Higher precedence doesn't mean that the prefix increment will be called before the multiplication operator, but in which order the parameters are bound to the corresponding operation.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions