Reputation: 183
I developing an app in which I need to store data related to a contact.
I list the contacts in a recycleView using a cursor and each itemView has a star button to set the contact as favorite (not the same as the system).
I managed to store the data in ContactsContract.Data
, doing this:
private void addContactData(long contactId, String displayName, boolean favorite) {
// displayName same as the value for Contacts.DISPLAY_NAME_PRIMARY
ArrayList<ContentProviderOperation> ops =
new ArrayList<>();
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTENT_URI)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_TYPE, CUSTOM_ACCOUNT_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.ACCOUNT_NAME, CUSTOM_ACCOUNT_NAME)
.withValue(ContactsContract.RawContacts.CONTACT_ID, contactId)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.StructuredName.DISPLAY_NAME, displayName)
.build());
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, CustomData.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(CustomData.IS_FAVORITE, favorite)
.build());
try {
ContentProviderResult[] contentProviderResults = cr.applyBatch(ContactsContract.AUTHORITY, ops);
return contactUri;
} catch (RemoteException | OperationApplicationException e) {
Log.e(getClass().getSimpleName(), e.getMessage(), e);
return null;
}
}
The problem I have is when two contacts have the exact same name ej. "Tom" and "Tom" if I press the fav button, is adding a third contact that is even listed in the device contacts app.
Some search guied me to add more data to distinguish the contacts using:
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Phone.NUMBER, phone)
.build());
// OR
ops.add(ContentProviderOperation.newInsert(ContactsContract.Data.CONTENT_URI)
.withValueBackReference(ContactsContract.Data.RAW_CONTACT_ID, 0)
.withValue(ContactsContract.Data.MIMETYPE, ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.CONTENT_ITEM_TYPE)
.withValue(ContactsContract.CommonDataKinds.Email.ADDRESS, email)
.build());
And it worked just fine, except if the fields are equals in both contacts. What do I need to avoid this behavior, and Why the CONTACT_ID isn't enough to do this kind of operations?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 86
Reputation: 28229
You need to tell Android to merge the new RawContact
you've just created with some (one or more) existing RawContacts
.
You do that using the AggregationException table, adding a row for each such "link".
See: https://stackoverflow.com/a/40869351/819355
Code snippet:
Builder builder = ContentProviderOperation.newUpdate(AggregationExceptions.CONTENT_URI);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.TYPE, AggregationExceptions.TYPE_KEEP_TOGETHER);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.RAW_CONTACT_ID1, yourNewRawContact);
builder.withValue(AggregationExceptions.RAW_CONTACT_ID2, someExistingRawContact);
ContentProviderOperation op = builder.build();
Upvotes: 1