Reputation: 6932
I was trying to implement Church numerals in Haskell. This is my code:
-- Church numerals in Haskell.
type Numeral a = (a -> a) -> (a -> a)
churchSucc :: Numeral a -> Numeral a
churchSucc n f = \x -> f (n f x)
-- Operations with Church numerals.
sum :: Numeral a -> Numeral a -> Numeral a
sum m n = m . churchSucc n
mult :: Numeral a -> Numeral a -> Numeral a
mult n m = n . m
-- Here comes the first problem
-- exp :: Numeral a -> Numeral a -> Numeral a
exp n m = m n
-- Convenience function to "numerify" a Church numeral.
add1 :: Integer -> Integer
add1 = (1 +)
numerify :: Numeral Integer -> Integer
numerify n = n add1 0
-- Here comes the second problem
toNumeral :: Integer -> Numeral Integer
toNumeral 0 = zero
toNumeral (x + 1) = churchSucc (toNumeral x)
My problem comes from exponentiation. If I declare the type signature of toNumeral
and exp
, the code doesn't compile. However, if I comment the type signature declarations, everything works fine. What would be the correct declarations for toNumeral
and exp
?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 249
Reputation: 29193
The reason exp
cannot be written the way you have it is that it involves passing a Numeral
as argument to a Numeral
. This requires having a Numeral (a -> a)
, but you only have a Numeral a
. You can write it as
exp :: Numeral a -> Numeral (a -> a) -> Numeral a
exp n m = m n
I don't see what's wrong with toNumeral
, aside from the fact that patterns like x + 1
should not be used.
toNumeral :: Integer -> Numeral a -- No need to restrict it to Integer
toNumeral 0 = \f v -> v
toNumeral x
| x > 0 = churchSucc $ toNumeral $ x - 1
| otherwise = error "negative argument"
Also, your sum
is bugged, because m . churchSucc n
is m * (n + 1)
, so it should be:
sum :: Numeral a -> Numeral a -> Numeral a
sum m n f x = m f $ n f x -- Repeat f, n times on x, and then m more times.
However, church numerals are functions that work on all types. That is, Numeral String
should not be different from Numeral Integer
, because a Numeral
shouldn't care what type it's working on. This is a universal quantification: Numeral
is a function, for all types a
, (a -> a) -> (a -> a)
, which is written, with RankNTypes
, as type Numeral = forall a. (a -> a) -> (a -> a)
.
This makes sense: a church numeral is defined by how many times its function argument is repeated. \f v -> v
calls f
0 times, so it is 0, \f v -> f v
is 1, etc. Forcing a Numeral
to work for all a
makes sure that it can only do that. However, allowing a Numeral
to care what type f
and v
have removes the restriction, and lets you write (\f v -> "nope") :: Numeral String
, even though that clearly isn't a Numeral
.
I would write this as
{-# LANGUAGE RankNTypes #-}
type Numeral = forall a. (a -> a) -> (a -> a)
_0 :: Numeral
_0 _ x = x
-- The numerals can be defined inductively, with base case 0 and inductive step churchSucc
-- Therefore, it helps to have a _0 constant lying around
churchSucc :: Numeral -> Numeral
churchSucc n f x = f (n f x) -- Cleaner without lambdas everywhere
sum :: Numeral -> Numeral -> Numeral
sum m n f x = m f $ n f x
mult :: Numeral -> Numeral -> Numeral
mult n m = n . m
exp :: Numeral -> Numeral -> Numeral
exp n m = m n
numerify :: Numeral -> Integer
numerify n = n (1 +) 0
toNumeral :: Integer -> Numeral
toNumeral 0 = _0
toNumeral x
| x > 0 = churchSucc $ toNumeral $ x - 1
| otherwise = error "negative argument"
instead, which looks so much cleaner, and is less likely to run into roadblocks than the original.
Demo:
main = do out "5:" _5
out "2:" _2
out "0:" _0
out "5^0:" $ exp _5 _0
out "5 + 2:" $ sum _5 _2
out "5 * 2:" $ mult _5 _2
out "5^2:" $ exp _5 _2
out "2^5:" $ exp _2 _5
out "(0^2)^5:" $ exp (exp _0 _2) _5
where _2 = toNumeral 2
_5 = toNumeral 5
out :: String -> Numeral -> IO () -- Needed to coax the inferencer
out str n = putStrLn $ str ++ "\t" ++ (show $ numerify n)
Upvotes: 6