Reputation: 9734
Given the following interface...
type Person struct {
name, gender string
}
type Citizen interface {
Create(name string) Citizen
GetName() string
GetGender() String
SayHello() String
}
... and the following Male
and Female
implementations:
type Male Person
func (m *Male) Create(name) Citizen {
return &Person{name, "male"}
}
func (m *Male) GetName() string {
return m.name
}
func (m *Male) GetGender() string {
return m.gender
}
func (m *Male) SayHello() string {
return "Hello (male voice)"
}
type Female Person
func (f *Female) Create(name) Citizen {
return &Person{name, "female"}
}
func (f *Female) GetName() string {
return f.name
}
func (f *Female) GetGender() string {
return f.gender
}
func (m *Female) SayHello() string {
return "Hello (female voice)"
}
func main() {
var p1 Person = &Male{}
var p2 Person = &Female{}
p1 = p1.Create("Joe")
p2 = p2.Create("Heidi")
log.Printf("%s is a %s",p1.GetName(), p1.GetGender())
log.Printf("%s says %s",p1.GetName(), p1.SayHello())
log.Printf("%s is a %s",p2.GetName(), p2.GetGender())
log.Printf("%s says %s",p2.GetName(), p2.SayHello())
}
As only Create
is gender-specific, is there a way to let Male
and Female
inherit a common implementation of methods GetName
and GetGender
?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 108
Reputation: 6284
Embed Person
in the Male
and Female
types and push the base methods up to Person
.
type Male struct {
Person
}
type Female struct {
Person
}
func (m *Person) GetName() string {
return m.Name
}
func (m *Person) GetGender() string {
return m.Gender
}
func main() {
var c Citizen
c = CreateMale("Joe")
fmt.Println(c.GetName(), c.GetGender(), "\n", c.SayHello())
c = CreateFemale("Jane")
fmt.Println(c.GetName(), c.GetGender(), "\n", c.SayHello())
}
See full example here: https://play.golang.org/p/GZcG-n_YpM
This uses the interface Citizen
instead of the type Person
in the assignment, so let me know if that isn't what you are looking for.
Upvotes: 4