Reputation: 1964
Sorry, I really miss something with the transmission of state
within props
of sub components in React.
I have implemented a version of a todo list with 3 components.
There is a Form
component and a ListTodo
component. The state is stored only in the App
component.
import React, {Component} from 'react';
import './App.css';
class App extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
tasks: ["un truc", "autre truc"]
};
this.addTask = this.addTask.bind(this);
}
addTask(task) {
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.push(task)
})
}
render() {
return (
<div className="App">
<Form onTaskAdded={ this.addTask }></Form>
<ListTodo tasks={ this.state.tasks }></ListTodo>
</div>
);
}
}
class Form extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
task: ""
}
this.handleChange = this.handleChange.bind(this);
this.addTask = this.addTask.bind(this);
}
handleChange(event) {
this.setState({
task: event.target.value
});
}
addTask(event) {
this.props.onTaskAdded(this.state.task);
event.preventDefault();
}
render() {
return (
<form onSubmit={ this.addTask }>
<input placeholder="À faire" onChange={ this.handleChange }></input>
<input type="submit"></input>
</form>
)
}
}
class ListTodo extends Component {
render() {
const tasks = this.props.tasks.map((t, i) => (
<li key={i}>{t}</li>
))
return (
<ul>{tasks}</ul>
)
}
}
export default App;
The display is good at start so the ListTodo
achieves to see the prop tasks
. But after a form submission, I get an error on ListTodo.render
:
TypeError: this.props.tasks.map is not a function
When I console.log the this.props.tasks
, I don't get my array but the length of the array.
Do you know why?
Edit : Thanks for answers guys, you're right. I missed the behavior of Array.push.
But React seems still odd. If I let the mistaken code
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.push(task)
})
then a console.log(JSON.stringify(this.state))
displays :
{"tasks":["un truc","autre truc","aze"]}
.
Very disturbing to not be able to trust a console.log...
Upvotes: 3
Views: 1658
Reputation: 866
The problem is from Array.push return the number of elements in the array and not the updated array
addTask(task) {
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.push(task)
})
}
To fix this you can push to state.tasks then setState with it later on:
addTask(task) {
this.state.tasks.push(task);
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks
})
}
This way you set state.task to the updated array.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 104519
As per MDN DOC:
The push() method adds one or more elements to the end of an array and returns the new length of the array.
Array.push never returns the result array, it returns the number, so after adding the first task, this.state.tasks
becomes a number, and it is throwing the error when you trying to run map on number.
You did the mistake here:
addTask(task) {
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.push(task)
})
}
Write it like this:
addTask(task) {
this.setState( prevState => ({
tasks: [...prevState.tasks, task]
}))
}
Another import thing here is, the new state will be depend on the previous state value, so instead of using this.state
inside setState, use updater function.
Explanation about Edit part:
Two important things are happening there:
1- setState is async so just after setState we can expect the updated state value.
Check this for more details about async behaviour of setState.
2- Array.push always mutate the original array by pushing the item into that, so you are directly mutating the state value by this.state.tasks.push()
.
Check the DOC for more details about setState.
Check the MDN Doc for spread operator (...)
.
Check this snippet:
let a = [1,2,3,4];
let b = a.push(5); //it will be a number
console.log('a = ', a);
console.log('b = ', b);
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 640
As the other answers stated, the Array push
method does not return the array. Just to complement the answers above, if you are using ES6, a nice and elegant way of doing this is using the spread operator (you can read more about it here)
this.setState({
tasks: [...this.state.tasks, task]
})
It is essentially the same as using the concat
method, but I think this has a nicer readability.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 2900
The problem is in how you add a task in the App’s state.
addTask(task) {
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.push(task)
})
}
See, Array.prototype.push
returns the length of the array after adding an element. What you really want is probably Array.prototype.concat
.
addTask(task) {
this.setState({
tasks: this.state.tasks.concat([ task ])
})
}
Also, thanks to @t-j-crowder pointers and as also reported by @mayank-shukla, you should use a different approach to mutate your state:
addTask(task) {
this.setState(function (state) {
return {
tasks: state.tasks.concat([ task ])
}
});
}
Or using ES2015 Arrows, Object destructuring and Array spread:
addTask(task) {
this.setState(({ tasks }) => ({
tasks: [ ...tasks, task ]
}));
}
Since Component.prototype.setState
can be asynchronous, passing a function to it will guarantee the new state values depend on the right, current previous values.
This means that if two or more setState
calls happen one after another you are this way sure that the result of the first one will be kept by applying the second.
Upvotes: 2