Reputation: 830
I am using Spring Kafka first time and I am not able to use Acknowledgement.acknowledge() method for manual commit in my consumer code as mentioned here https://docs.spring.io/spring-kafka/reference/html/_reference.html#committing-offsets. Mine is spring-boot application. If I am not using manual commit process than my code is working fine. But when I use Acknowledgement.acknowledge() for manual commit it shows error related to bean. Also If I am not using manual commit properly please suggest me the right way to do it.
Error message:
***************************
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
***************************
Description:
Field ack in Receiver required a bean of type 'org.springframework.kafka.support.Acknowledgment' that could not be found.
Action:
Consider defining a bean of type 'org.springframework.kafka.support.Acknowledgment' in your configuration.
I googled this error I found that I need to add @Component but that is already there in my consumer code.
My consumer code looks like this: Receiver.java
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecord;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.kafka.annotation.KafkaListener;
import org.springframework.kafka.support.Acknowledgment;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class Receiver {
@Autowired
public Acknowledgment ack;
private CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
@KafkaListener(topics = "${kafka.topic.TestTopic}")
public void receive(ConsumerRecord<?, ?> consumerRecord){
System.out.println(consumerRecord.value());
latch.countDown();
ack.acknowledge();
}
}
My producer code looks like this: Sender.java
import java.util.Map;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Autowired;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.KafkaTemplate;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class Sender {
@Autowired
private KafkaTemplate<String, Map<String, Object>> kafkaTemplate;
public void send(Map<String, Object> map){
kafkaTemplate.send("TestTopic", map);
}
}
EDIT 1:
My new consumer code looks like this: Receiver.java
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecord;
import org.springframework.kafka.annotation.KafkaListener;
import org.springframework.kafka.support.Acknowledgment;
import org.springframework.stereotype.Component;
@Component
public class Receiver {
private CountDownLatch latch = new CountDownLatch(1);
@KafkaListener(topics = "${kafka.topic.TestTopic}", containerFactory = "kafkaManualAckListenerContainerFactory")
public void receive(ConsumerRecord<?, ?> consumerRecord, Acknowledgment ack){
System.out.println(consumerRecord.value());
latch.countDown();
ack.acknowledge();
}
}
I changed my configuration class also:
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
import org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerConfig;
import org.apache.kafka.common.serialization.StringDeserializer;
import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.Value;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean;
import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration;
import org.springframework.kafka.annotation.EnableKafka;
import org.springframework.kafka.config.ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.ConsumerFactory;
import org.springframework.kafka.core.DefaultKafkaConsumerFactory;
@Configuration
@EnableKafka
public class ReceiverConfig {
@Value("${kafka.bootstrap-servers}")
private String bootstrapServers;
@Value("${spring.kafka.consumer.group-id}")
private String consumerGroupId;
@Bean
public Map<String, Object> consumerConfigs() throws SendGridException {
Map<String, Object> props = new HashMap<>();
props.put(ConsumerConfig.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS_CONFIG, bootstrapServers);
props.put(ConsumerConfig.KEY_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringDeserializer.class);
props.put(ConsumerConfig.VALUE_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG, StringDeserializer.class);
props.put(ConsumerConfig.GROUP_ID_CONFIG, consumerGroupId);
return props;
}
@Bean
public ConsumerFactory<String, String> consumerFactory(){
return new DefaultKafkaConsumerFactory<>(consumerConfigs());
}
/*@Bean
public ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<String, String> kafkaListenerContainerFactory(){
ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<String, String> factory = new ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<>();
factory.setConsumerFactory(consumerFactory());
return factory;
}*/
@Bean
public ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<String, String> kafkaManualAckListenerContainerFactory(){
ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<String, String> factory = new ConcurrentKafkaListenerContainerFactory<>();
factory.setConsumerFactory(consumerFactory());
return factory;
}
@Bean
public Receiver receiver() {
return new Receiver();
}
}
After adding containerFactory = "kafkaManualAckListenerContainerFactory" to my receive() method I am getting the below error.
***************************
APPLICATION FAILED TO START
***************************
Description:
Parameter 1 of method kafkaListenerContainerFactory in org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.kafka.KafkaAnnotationDrivenConfiguration required a bean of type 'org.springframework.kafka.core.ConsumerFactory' that could not be found.
- Bean method 'kafkaConsumerFactory' in 'KafkaAutoConfiguration' not loaded because @ConditionalOnMissingBean (types: org.springframework.kafka.core.ConsumerFactory; SearchStrategy: all) found bean 'consumerFactory'
Action:
Consider revisiting the conditions above or defining a bean of type 'org.springframework.kafka.core.ConsumerFactory' in your configuration.
Upvotes: 20
Views: 90882
Reputation: 121462
You really should follow documentation:
When using manual
AckMode
, the listener can also be provided with theAcknowledgment
; this example also shows how to use a different container factory.
@KafkaListener(id = "baz", topics = "myTopic",
containerFactory = "kafkaManualAckListenerContainerFactory")
public void listen(String data, Acknowledgment ack) {
...
ack.acknowledge();
}
There is really nowhere noted that Acknowledgment
is a bean. So, change your receive()
@KafkaListener
method signature appropriately and remove that @Autowired
for suspicious Acknowledgment
bean - it just doesn't exists because this object is a part (header) of each received message.
Upvotes: 17
Reputation: 71
Java code:
@Service
public class ServiceCallKafkaListener {
@KafkaListener(id = "listenerId",
groupId = "groupListenerId",
topics = "topicName")
public void listenServiceCall(@Payload String message,
Acknowledgment acknowledgment) {
//here is your logic for message processing
boolean logicForMessageProcessingCompleted = true;
if (logicForMessageProcessingCompleted) {
//manual commit
acknowledgment.acknowledge();
}
}
}
application.properties
#type of acknowledgment mode
spring.kafka.listener.ack-mode=MANUAL_IMMEDIATE
#property that turns off auto commit
spring.kafka.consumer.enable-auto-commit=false
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1734
Those who are using spring boot application, simple add below to your application.yml (or environment specific file).
spring:
kafka:
listener:
ack-mode: manual
Above change will make Acknowledgment ack
argument available inside
receive(ConsumerRecord<?, ?> consumerRecord, Acknowledgment ack)
method automatically.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 351
For those still looking for a solution to these errors concerning manual acknowledgment, you don't need to specify containerFactory = "kafkaManualAckListenerContainerFactory", instead you can just add:
factory.getContainerProperties().setAckMode(ContainerProperties.AckMode.MANUAL_IMMEDIATE);
to your receiver config just before you return the factory object.
Then you also need:
props.put(ConsumerConfig.ENABLE_AUTO_COMMIT_CONFIG, false);
in consumer config props.
So in the end your listener method can simply look like:
@KafkaListener(topics = "${spring.kafka.topic}")
private void listen(@Payload String payload, Acknowledgment acknowledgment) {
//Whatever code you want to do with the payload
acknowledgement.acknowledge(); //or even pass the acknowledgment to a different method and acknowledge even later
}
Upvotes: 25