Reputation: 121
I have a table looking like this:
x Line Name
-40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50
-1500 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
-1000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
0 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 700
1000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 673
2000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 689 646
3000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 694 662 NaN
4000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 696 668 636 NaN
5000 NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 695 669 642 611 NaN
6000 NaN NaN NaN NaN 693 669 644 617 587 NaN
7000 NaN NaN NaN 691 666 643 619 593 563 NaN
8000 NaN NaN 691 665 641 619 595 569 NaN NaN
9000 NaN 691 664 639 616 595 572 547 NaN NaN
10000 691 664 639 615 592 571 550 525 NaN NaN
11000 664 638 614 591 569 549 528 503 NaN NaN
12000 638 613 590 567 546 527 507 483 NaN NaN
13000 612 589 566 545 525 506 486 NaN NaN NaN
14000 587 564 543 522 503 485 466 NaN NaN NaN
15000 562 541 520 500 482 465 446 NaN NaN NaN
16000 539 518 498 479 462 446 428 NaN NaN NaN
17000 516 496 477 459 442 427 409 NaN NaN NaN
18000 494 475 457 439 423 409 NaN NaN NaN NaN
19000 473 455 437 420 405 392 NaN NaN NaN NaN
20000 452 435 418 402 388 375 NaN NaN NaN NaN
I am able to graph a plot that looks like this:
From Left to right the blue lines represent "Line Name" -40 to 50.
Here is the exact code you can copy in:
%% Load data
Array6 =[NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 700
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 673
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 689 646
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 694 662 NaN
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 696 668 636 NaN
NaN NaN NaN NaN NaN 695 669 642 611 NaN
NaN NaN NaN NaN 693 669 644 617 587 NaN
NaN NaN NaN 691 666 643 619 593 563 NaN
NaN NaN 691 665 641 619 595 569 NaN NaN
NaN 691 664 639 616 595 572 547 NaN NaN
691 664 639 615 592 571 550 525 NaN NaN
664 638 614 591 569 549 528 503 NaN NaN
638 613 590 567 546 527 507 483 NaN NaN
612 589 566 545 525 506 486 NaN NaN NaN
587 564 543 522 503 485 466 NaN NaN NaN
562 541 520 500 482 465 446 NaN NaN NaN
539 518 498 479 462 446 428 NaN NaN NaN
516 496 477 459 442 427 409 NaN NaN NaN
494 475 457 439 423 409 NaN NaN NaN NaN
473 455 437 420 405 392 NaN NaN NaN NaN
452 435 418 402 388 375 NaN NaN NaN NaN];
MakeMatrix = [-1500,-1000:1000:20000];
x = transpose([MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix]); %transpose switches rows and columns=to match array dimentions
%% Plot
hold on
A=plot(x,Array6,'b*')
grid on
grid minor
Here is the big question, and trust me I have been trying to solve this for a week now and have not gotten close. I want to separate the data of "Line Name" -50,-40 and -20 into vectors as seen here:
x1 = transpose([-1500,-1000:1000:20000]); y1 = Array6(:,1); %LineName-40
x2 = transpose([-1500,-1000:1000:20000]); y2 = Array6(:,2); %LineName-30
x3 = transpose([-1500,-1000:1000:20000]); y3 = Array6(:,4); %LineName-10
The problem was that the NaNs in my fit not being able to work, but this has been solved as seen below:
f = fittype('poly2');
DatumLine1Fit = fit(x1,y1,f, 'Exclude', isnan(y1));
DatumLine2Fit = fit(x2,y2,f, 'Exclude', isnan(y2));
DatumLine3Fit = fit(x3,y3,f, 'Exclude', isnan(y3));
Now I fetch the coeficcients and place them in a matrix:
DatumLine1Coeff = coeffvalues(DatumLine1Fit);
DatumLine2Coeff = coeffvalues(DatumLine2Fit);
DatumLine3Coeff = coeffvalues(DatumLine3Fit);
CoeffMatrix3x3 = transpose([DatumLine1Coeff;DatumLine2Coeff;DatumLine3Coeff]);
This gives the CoeffMatrix3x3 values as:
3.64801864801874e-07 3.46403596403601e-07 3.13873626373624e-07
-0.0348622377622380 -0.0333289210789212 -0.0307339285714285
1003.38694638695 962.893356643357 890.746978021977
However, this is the problem, this is the coefficients for coulombs(10,9 and 7), which is the opposite side of the matrix, and not coulombs(1,2 and 4) as indicated in my code?
The correct CoeffMatrix3x3 for coulombs(1,2 and 4) should be:
4.5e-07 3.393e-07 3.25e-07
-0.02775 -0.02815 -0.02881
700.6 744.1 805.8
Here is some code to visually verify the wrong coeficcients are obtained(Note the fit lines are on lines 20,40 and 50...they should be on line -40,-30,-10):
DatumLineSet = [-40 -30 -10]; % Left Original lines used for coefficient determination(Not need to be eavenly spaced)
AdditionalLineSet = [-40: 10:-10]; % Left Additional lines to be plotted from the DatumLineSet
FitLine_XRange = -5000:100:20000; %X-Axis points created for the fit line to follow
for i = 1:length(AdditionalLineSet), %length= For vectors, the length is simply the number of elements
% straight line coefficients
c02 = interp1(DatumLineSet,CoeffMatrix3x3(1,:),AdditionalLineSet(i)); %a from y=ax^2+bx+c
c01 = interp1(DatumLineSet,CoeffMatrix3x3(2,:),AdditionalLineSet(i)); %b
c00 = interp1(DatumLineSet,CoeffMatrix3x3(3,:),AdditionalLineSet(i)); %c
% generate the line
FitLine_YRange = polyval([c02 c01 c00],FitLine_XRange);
plot(FitLine_XRange,FitLine_YRange,'b');
end
Please help. Many Thanks! You can find the correct coefficients with the matlab curve fitting app as explained in my comment.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 162
Reputation: 626
I believe there is no problem with your code. The problem is in what you are comparing with at the end.
If I build and fit the first column of your data manually:
format shortg
x1=[10000:1000:20000]';
y1=[691;664;638;612;587;562;539;516;494;473;452];
coeffvalues(fit(x1,y1,'poly2'))'
ans =
3.648e-07
-0.034862
1003.4
This is the same as your code is giving, suggesting that your 'correct' answer at the end which you are comparing to is the one that is wrong.
As an efficiency/readability issue, you should also change the line:
x = transpose([MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix;MakeMatrix]); %transpose switches rows and columns=to match array dimentions
to
x = transpose(repmat(MakeMatrix,10,1));
or even
x = repmat(MakeMatrix,10,1)';
%% EDIT
After reviewing your new comment below, I believe I have discovered the problem:
After the plot at the top, you make the statement:
From Left to right the blue lines represent "Line Name" -40 to 50.
This is the incorrect statement that has been causing the confusion. This can be verified by comparing the first and last column of your table to the left and right curves of the plot:
In the table, the "-40" column has 11 integer values and the "50" column has 3 integer values.
In the plot, it is the right-most set of points that has 11 values and the left-most that has 3.
Upvotes: 1