Reputation: 25986
Let's say I have this
#!/usr/bin/perl
%x = ('a' => 1, 'b' => 2, 'c' => 3);
and I would like to know if the value 2 is a hash value in %x
.
How is that done?
Upvotes: 14
Views: 42330
Reputation: 118605
Shorter answer using smart match (Perl version 5.10 or later):
print 2 ~~ [values %x];
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 49
Where $count would be the result:
my $count = grep { $_ == 2 } values %x;
This will not only show you if it's a value in the hash, but how many times it occurs as a value. Alternatively you can do it like this as well:
my $count = grep {/2/} values %x;
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 42094
Fundamentally, a hash is a data structure optimized for solving the converse question, knowing whether the key 2 is present. But it's hard to judge without knowing, so let's assume that won't change.
Possibilities presented here will depend on:
grep $_==2, values %x
(also spelled grep {$_==1} values %x
) will return a list of as many 2s as are present in the hash, or, in scalar context, the number of matches. Evaluated as a boolean in a condition, it yields just what you want.grep
works on versions of Perl as old as I can remember.use List::Util qw(first); first {$_==2} values %x
returns only the first match, undef
if none. That makes it faster, as it will short-circuit (stop examining elements) as soon as it succeeds. This isn't a problem for 2, but take care that the returned element doesn't necessarily evaluate to boolean true. Use defined
in those cases.List::Util
is a part of the Perl core since 5.8.use List::MoreUtils qw(any); any {$_==2} values %x
returns exactly the information you requested as a boolean, and exhibits the short-circuiting behavior.List::MoreUtils
is available from CPAN.2 ~~ [values %x]
returns exactly the information you requested as a boolean, and exhibits the short-circuiting behavior.Construct a hash that maps values to keys, and use that one as a natural hash to test key existence.
my %r = reverse %x;
if ( exists $r{2} ) { ... }
Use a reverse lookup as above. You'll need to keep it up to date, which is left as an exercise to the reader/editor. (hint: value collisions are tricky)
Upvotes: 22
Reputation: 129403
Everyone's answer so far was not performance-driven. While the smart-match (~~
) solution short circuits (e.g. stops searching when something is found), the grep
ones do not.
Therefore, here's a solution which may have better performance for Perl before 5.10 that doesn't have smart match operator:
use List::MoreUtils qw(any);
if (any { $_ == 2 } values %x) {
print "Found!\n";
}
Please note that this is just a specific example of searching in a list (values %x
) in this case and as such, if you care about performance, the standard performance analysis of searching in a list apply as discussed in detail in this answer
Upvotes: 7
Reputation: 62037
my %x = ('a' => 1, 'b' => 2, 'c' => 3);
if (grep { $_ == 2 } values %x ) {
print "2 is in hash\n";
}
else {
print "2 is not in hash\n";
}
See also: perldoc -q hash
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 35788
my %reverse = reverse %x;
if( defined( $reverse{2} ) ) {
print "2 is a value in the hash!\n";
}
If you want to find out the keys for which the value is 2:
foreach my $key ( keys %x ) {
print "2 is the value for $key\n" if $x{$key} == 2;
}
Upvotes: 9