Reputation: 36397
Obviously, you can use the |
(pipe?) to represent OR
, but is there a way to represent AND
as well?
Specifically, I'd like to match paragraphs of text that contain ALL of a certain phrase, but in no particular order.
Upvotes: 1034
Views: 1311147
Reputation: 111
In javascript You can do this:
If you wanna check if a password contains both miniscule and majuscule letters, use this:
passwordValue.search(/[a-z]/) !== -1 && passwordValue.search(/[A-Z]/) !== -1
This statement returns true if the password input contains both miniscule and majuscule letters, otherwise it returns false.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1358
Here is a possible "form" for "and" operator:
Take the following regex for an example:
If we want to match words without the "e" character, we could do this:
/\b[^\We]+\b/g
\W
means NOT a "word" character.^\W
means a "word" character.[^\We]
means a "word" character, but not an "e".see it in action: word without e
I think this pattern can be used as an "and" operator for regular expressions.
In general, if:
A = not a
B = not b
then:
[^AB] = not(A or B)
= not(A) and not(B)
= a and b
So, if we want to implement the concept of difference set in regular expressions, we could do this:
a - b = a and not(b)
= a and B
= [^Ab]
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 417
((yes).*(no))|((no).*(yes))
Will match sentence having both yes
and no
at the same time, regardless the order in which they appear:
Do i like cookies? **Yes**, i do. But milk - **no**, definitely no.
**No**, you may not have my phone. **Yes**, you may go f yourself.
Will both match, ignoring case.
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 1675
Look at this example:
We have 2 regexps A and B and we want to match both of them, so in pseudo-code it looks like this:
pattern = "/A AND B/"
It can be written without using the AND operator like this:
pattern = "/NOT (NOT A OR NOT B)/"
in PCRE:
"/(^(^A|^B))/"
regexp_match(pattern,data)
Upvotes: 51
Reputation: 18860
In addition to the accepted answer
I will provide you with some practical examples that will get things more clear to some of You. For example lets say we have those three lines of text:
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +0200] // only this + will get selected
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:x9 +0200]
[12/Oct/2015:00:37:29 +020x]
See demo here DEMO
What we want to do here is to select the + sign but only if it's after two numbers with a space and if it's before four numbers. Those are the only constraints. We would use this regular expression to achieve it:
'~(?<=\d{2} )\+(?=\d{4})~g'
Note if you separate the expression it will give you different results.
Or perhaps you want to select some text between tags... but not the tags! Then you could use:
'~(?<=<p>).*?(?=<\/p>)~g'
for this text:
<p>Hello !</p> <p>I wont select tags! Only text with in</p>
See demo here DEMO
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 4779
The AND operator is implicit in the RegExp syntax.
The OR operator has instead to be specified with a pipe.
The following RegExp:
var re = /ab/;
means the letter a
AND the letter b
.
It also works with groups:
var re = /(co)(de)/;
it means the group co
AND the group de
.
Replacing the (implicit) AND with an OR would require the following lines:
var re = /a|b/;
var re = /(co)|(de)/;
Upvotes: 43
Reputation: 3880
You could pipe your output to another regex. Using grep, you could do this:
grep A | grep B
Upvotes: 8
Reputation: 2025
Why not use awk?
with awk regex AND, OR matters is so simple
awk '/WORD1/ && /WORD2/ && /WORD3/' myfile
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 17384
Use AND outside the regular expression. In PHP lookahead operator did not not seem to work for me, instead I used this
if( preg_match("/^.{3,}$/",$pass1) && !preg_match("/\s{1}/",$pass1))
return true;
else
return false;
The above regex will match if the password length is 3 characters or more and there are no spaces in the password.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 83071
Use a non-consuming regular expression.
The typical (i.e. Perl/Java) notation is:
(?=
expr)
This means "match expr but after that continue matching at the original match-point."
You can do as many of these as you want, and this will be an "and." Example:
(?=match this expression)(?=match this too)(?=oh, and this)
You can even add capture groups inside the non-consuming expressions if you need to save some of the data therein.
Upvotes: 521
Reputation: 75252
You need to use lookahead as some of the other responders have said, but the lookahead has to account for other characters between its target word and the current match position. For example:
(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3)
The .*
in the first lookahead lets it match however many characters it needs to before it gets to "word1". Then the match position is reset and the second lookahead seeks out "word2". Reset again, and the final part matches "word3"; since it's the last word you're checking for, it isn't necessary that it be in a lookahead, but it doesn't hurt.
In order to match a whole paragraph, you need to anchor the regex at both ends and add a final .*
to consume the remaining characters. Using Perl-style notation, that would be:
/^(?=.*word1)(?=.*word2)(?=.*word3).*$/m
The 'm' modifier is for multline mode; it lets the ^
and $
match at paragraph boundaries ("line boundaries" in regex-speak). It's essential in this case that you not use the 's' modifier, which lets the dot metacharacter match newlines as well as all other characters.
Finally, you want to make sure you're matching whole words and not just fragments of longer words, so you need to add word boundaries:
/^(?=.*\bword1\b)(?=.*\bword2\b)(?=.*\bword3\b).*$/m
Upvotes: 487
Reputation: 34281
You can do that with a regular expression but probably you'll want to some else. For example use several regexp and combine them in a if clause.
You can enumerate all possible permutations with a standard regexp, like this (matches a, b and c in any order):
(abc)|(bca)|(acb)|(bac)|(cab)|(cba)
However, this makes a very long and probably inefficient regexp, if you have more than couple terms.
If you are using some extended regexp version, like Perl's or Java's, they have better ways to do this. Other answers have suggested using positive lookahead operation.
Upvotes: 30
Reputation: 47770
If you use Perl regular expressions, you can use positive lookahead:
For example
(?=[1-9][0-9]{2})[0-9]*[05]\b
would be numbers greater than 100 and divisible by 5
Upvotes: 10
Reputation: 4688
Is it not possible in your case to do the AND on several matching results? in pseudocode
regexp_match(pattern1, data) && regexp_match(pattern2, data) && ...
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 12718
The order is always implied in the structure of the regular expression. To accomplish what you want, you'll have to match the input string multiple times against different expressions.
What you want to do is not possible with a single regexp.
Upvotes: 11