Reputation: 2712
In Python 2.7 ConfigParser.ConfigParser
interpolates pattern %(__name__)s
as name of the section.
In Python 3.6 (as well as 3.3) configparser.ConfigParser
fails at the same interpolation with InterpolationMissingOptionError
exception.
When has the behaviour of the interpolation changed? What is the rationale of the decision (as it is harming backward-compatibility)?
In contrast to how to interpolate the section-name with configparser I am not asking how can I get that interpolation in Python 3.x.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 206
Reputation: 55884
In python 3.2 the old ConfigParser class (which implemented __name__
interpolation) was removed and replaced by what had previously been the SafeConfigParser class. From the What's New file:
The configparser module was modified to improve usability and predictability of the default parser and its supported INI syntax. The old ConfigParser class was removed in favor of SafeConfigParser which has in turn been renamed to ConfigParser.
The detailed motivation seems to be described in this bug report:
I want to sum up all strange things about the behaviour of
__name__
, a special key present in every section of a parser instance.
- There is a special
__name__
key in every section.- Except for the DEFAULTSECT.
__name__
key is set for every section read from a file.- and not when adding by
add_section()
.- if
__name__
does exist, it's not visible inparser.options('section')
- but it is visible here:
parser.has_option('section', '__name__') == True
- and can be obtained by
parser.get('section', '__name__')
- and can be changed by
parser.set('section', '__name__', 'ANY VALUE')
- and can be removed by
parser.remove_option('section', '__name__')
- even if the value is changed by
parser.set()
, it won't be written back to a file withparser.write()
All this looks like a feature that was not particularly complete and well defined when it was first created. Or possibly, it became rotten with time and now nobody is using it anyway. That way or the other, I couldn't come up with a valid use case for
__name__
with the current implementation. It doesn't serve any internal purpose and the only way you can actually get it is toparser.get('section', '__name__')
which returns 'section' anyway. About as useless as it gets. Of course, one can go and take the internal parser._sections data structure of the parser but that's evil.I want simply remove all mentions of a special
__name__
key in configparser.py. Backwards compatibility is not a concern here because in this case we have a concept that is so broken that you can't actually use it.
Upvotes: 1