Reputation: 135
Why in Kotlin/Scala companion objects can implements some interfaces, what benefits this can have? When is useful to use this feature?
Upvotes: 4
Views: 2109
Reputation: 43861
You can use companion object
s and inheritance for some level of class-lavel or static polymorphism.
Consider an interface
interface Factory<T> {
fun create(): T
}
Now, we create a class whose companion object implements it
class Foo {
companion object: Factory<Foo> {
override fun create() = Foo()
}
}
Now we can create an extension function for all factories to create and e.g. log the object.
fun <T> Factory<T>.createAndLog(): T {
val t = create()
println(t)
return t
}
Und use it like so
Foo.createAndLog()
Consider a marker interface
interface Queryable<T>
We now have two classes User
and Article
that represent tables in a database whose companion object
implements the interface.
class User(val id: String) {
companion object: Queryable<User> {}
}
class Article(val authorId: String) {
companion object: : Queryable<Article> {}
}
We can now define an extension function to create a query from the class
fun <T> Queryable<T>.query() = db.createQuery<T>()
which we can call as
User.query()
//or
Article.query()
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 170919
Because companion object
s are object
s, object
s can implement interfaces (or extend classes), and there is no good reason to disallow it for companion object
s in particular.
One common use in Scala is for factories: e.g. Seq
, List
, Vector
etc. companion objects all extend TraversableFactory
so you can write code working with a TraversableFactory
and pass any of them to construct the type you want. E.g.
def build[CC[X] <: Traversable[X] with GenericTraversableTemplate[X, CC], A](factory: TraversableFactory[CC])(elems: A*) = factory(elems)
// build(List)(1,2,3) == List(1, 2, 3)
// build(Set)(1,2,3) == Set(1, 2, 3)
Similarly, all case class companion objects extend function types.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 3921
You use singleton object when you need only one instance of particular class in program.
E.g. Scala's Nil
implements List[Nothing]
. Rather than every type of list to implement it's particular Nil
there is just one of them.
In typeclass pattern, where you have just one implicit object
for corresponding implementation.
Also, where you'd create a public static Something
in Java, you'd create that in a companion object.
I personally found them useful for implementing an sbt plugin, that renders object Blah extends Renderable
to files blah.html
. Find more about usefulness here. I had to know that it implements that trait!
Upvotes: 1