Reputation: 2814
This is a useless case of concatenation via foldl
, purely educational (for me):
foldl (\xs x -> xs ++ [x]) [1,2] [11,12,13]
[1,2,11,12,13]
Is there a way to pack it even tighter, using composition instead of the lambda?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 104
Reputation: 2814
This is just a better readable summary extracted from the comments by HTNW and Will Ness:
-- Reduction to poinfree
a = \xs x -> xs ++ [x]
b = \xs x -> xs ++ return x
c = \xs x -> ((xs ++) . return) x
d = \xs x -> ((. return) (xs ++)) x
e = \xs x -> ((. return) . (++)) xs x
Upvotes: 1