Reputation: 493
I am developing a Django 2.0 project app. It has a (non-working) models.py file, which looks something like this:
from django.db import models
from django.utils import timezone
class Computer(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=25)
def __str__(self):
return "Computer {}".format(self.name)
class Software(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=25)
description = models.CharField(max_length=1024, blank=True)
def __str__(self):
return self.name
class SoftwareVersion(models.Model):
software = models.ForeignKey(Software, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="versions")
version = models.CharField(max_length=100)
released_at = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now)
def __str__(self):
return "{} {}".format(self.software, self.version)
class ComputerSoftwareBundle(models.Model):
computer = models.ForeignKey(Computer, on_delete=models.CASCADE, related_name="bundles")
installed_at = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now)
versions = models.ManyToManyField(SoftwareVersion, through="BundleSoftwareVersion", related_name="bundles")
class BundleSoftwareVersion(models.Model):
bundle = models.ForeignKey(ComputerSoftwareBundle, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
version = models.ForeignKey(SoftwareVersion, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
class Meta:
unique_together = (("bundle", "version__software"),)
The app tracks software bundles currently or previously installed on computers. The thing here is that a bundle should not contain more than one version of the same software. Also, SoftwareVersion should contain a reference to Software, because the same version string has a different meaning for different pieces of software.
The code does not work as described in this Stackoverflow answer. I left the unique_together line in to illustrate what I am trying to achieve.
I've tried to work around this limitation of Django (not being able to use fields referred to via a foreign key in unique_together) by overriding the save and validate_unique methods in BundleSoftwareVersion but that did not work out completely well. Here's the implementation I have tried:
class BundleSoftwareVersion(models.Model):
bundle = models.ForeignKey(ComputerSoftwareBundle, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
version = models.ForeignKey(SoftwareVersion, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.validate_unique()
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
def validate_unique(self, exclude=None):
super().validate_unique(exclude)
bundle_versions = BundleSoftwareVersion.objects.filter(bundle=self.bundle,
version__software=self.version.software)
count = len(bundle_versions)
if not self.pk:
# if this instance is not stored in the database,
# we need to increment the count to take this instance
# into account
count += 1
if count > 1:
raise ValidationError("There already is an instance of software '{}' in this bundle.".format(self.version.software))
I have thus far tried out these models via the admin site. The checks work when changing an existing ComputerSoftwareBundle (the admin site displays a message next to the offending entry), but adding results in an uncaught exception.
Is there a better way to enforce this kind of uniqueness?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 217
Reputation: 493
I have come up with a workaround:
class BundleSoftwareVersion(models.Model):
bundle = models.ForeignKey(ComputerSoftwareBundle, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
version = models.ForeignKey(SoftwareVersion, on_delete=models.CASCADE)
_software = models.ForeignKey(Software, on_delete=models.CASCADE, null=True, editable=False)
class Meta:
unique_together = (("bundle", "_software"),)
def save(self, *args, **kwargs):
self._software = self.version.software
super().save(*args, **kwargs)
As you can see, I now have a helper field _software
which is used in unique_together
and into which the self.version.software
is stored on each save.
So far, I have experienced one downside with this approach: trying to save a ComputerSoftwareBundle
containing duplicate software instances results in an error page for IntegrityError
being displayed instead of an error message within the form.
I would appreciate suggestions on how to fix this downside, or even suggestions for a different approach altogether.
Upvotes: 1