Reputation: 4385
Given the following class (simplified for the question):
public static class Match {
private final String type;
private final int score;
public Match(String type, int score) {
this.type = type;
this.score = score;
}
public String getType() {
return type;
}
public int getScore() {
return score;
}
}
I have a Stream<Match>
that contains multiple instances of the class, the same type appears multiple times, but with different scores:
Stream.of(new Match("A", 1), new Match("A", 2), new Match("A", 4), new Match("A", 10),
new Match("B", 3), new Match("B", 6), new Match("B", 12),
new Match("C", 1));
I now want to collect the stream so that the result is a List<Match>
containing only the instances with the highest score of each type.
The following code is working, but I am not sure if it is the "optimal" solution (aside from the horrible reading and formatting):
.collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(
Collectors.groupingBy(Match::getType, Collectors.collectingAndThen(
Collectors.toList(),
l -> l.stream().max(Comparator.comparing(Match::getScore)).get())), Map::values))
.forEach(m -> System.out.println(m.getType() + ": " + m.getScore()));
and:
.collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(
Collectors.groupingBy(Match::getType, Collectors.maxBy(Comparator.comparing(Match::getScore))), Map::values))
.forEach(m -> m.ifPresent(ma -> System.out.println(ma.getType() + ": " + ma.getScore())));
Output (correct):
A: 10
B: 12
C: 1
Additionally I was not able to extract a generic, static method returning a collector so that I can simply use it where I need in a way like:
.collect(distinctMaxByProperty(Match::getType, Match::getScore)
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Upvotes: 8
Views: 2605
Reputation: 298163
Don’t collect into a List
, just to extract one value, when you can collect the maximum element in the first place, e.g.
Map<String,Match> result =
Stream.of(new Match("A", 1), new Match("A", 2), new Match("A", 4), new Match("A", 10),
new Match("B", 3), new Match("B", 6), new Match("B", 12), new Match("C", 1))
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Match::getType, Collectors.collectingAndThen(
Collectors.reducing(BinaryOperator.maxBy(
Comparator.comparingInt(Match::getScore))),
Optional::get)));
But whenever you encounter the necessity to extract an Optional
in the context of groupingBy
, it’s worth checking whether toMap` with merge function can give a simpler result:
Map<String,Match> result =
Stream.of(new Match("A", 1), new Match("A", 2), new Match("A", 4), new Match("A", 10),
new Match("B", 3), new Match("B", 6), new Match("B", 12), new Match("C", 1))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Match::getType, Function.identity(),
BinaryOperator.maxBy(Comparator.comparingInt(Match::getScore))));
Once you have the Map
you can produce your desired output via
result.values().forEach(m -> System.out.println(m.getType() + ": " + m.getScore()));
But if you don’t need the actual Match
instances, you can do it even simpler:
Stream.of(new Match("A", 1), new Match("A", 2), new Match("A", 4), new Match("A", 10),
new Match("B", 3), new Match("B", 6), new Match("B", 12), new Match("C", 1))
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Match::getType, Match::getScore, Math::max))
.forEach((type,score) -> System.out.println(type + ": " + score));
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 2137
I have two methods for you.
A possible implementation is to use Collectors.toMap()
to answers your problem.
stream.collect(Collectors.toMap(Match::getType, Match::getScore, Math::max));
And if you prefer to get a List<Match>()
, you can remap the result
stream
.collect(Collectors.toMap(Match::getType, Match::getScore, Math::max))
.entrySet()
.stream()
.map(e -> new Match(e.getKey(), e.getValue()))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
Like you say in your question, it is possible to extract this logic in a custom collector. You can do it like this:
public class MaxMatch implements Collector<Match, Map<String, Integer>, List<Match>> {
@Override
public Supplier<Map<String, Integer>> supplier() {
return HashMap::new;
}
@Override
public BiConsumer<Map<String, Integer>, Match> accumulator() {
return (map, match) -> {
Integer score = match.getScore();
if(map.containsKey(match.getType())) {
score = Math.max(score, map.get(match.getType()));
}
map.put(match.getType(), score);
};
}
@Override
public BinaryOperator<Map<String, Integer>> combiner() {
return (mapA, mapB) -> {
mapA.forEach((k, v) -> {
if(mapB.containsKey(k)) { mapB.put(k, Math.max(v, mapB.get(k))); }
else { mapB.put(k, v); }
});
return mapB;
};
}
@Override
public Function<Map<String, Integer>, List<Match>> finisher() {
return (map) -> map.entrySet().stream().map(e -> new Match(e.getKey(), e.getValue())).collect(Collectors.toList());
}
@Override
public Set<Characteristics> characteristics() {
return Collections.emptySet();
}
}
and use it like this:
stream.collect(new MaxMatch());
Hope this help you :)
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 3947
Try to use a TreeMap
for this :
UPDATE
List<Match> matchStream1 = matchStream.
collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Match::getType,
Collectors.toCollection(() -> new TreeSet<>(Comparator.comparing(Match::getScore)))))
.values()
.stream()
.map(TreeSet::last)
.collect(Collectors.toList());
In case your Match
class implements Comparable
. You can simplify this:
() -> new TreeSet<>(Comparator.comparing(Match::getScore))
to this:
TreeSet::new
Upvotes: 1