Reputation: 1
I am trying to learn how to use properly the OWLAPI but i am getting some troubles:
i have an ontology which structures the activities (e.g. individual and social activities); my aim is to create an easy example of inconsistency in order to get used with this API: i want to state that soccer is an individual activity.
IndividualActivity
is defined in Protegè as Equivalent to (Activity and (hasActor exactly 1 Person))
.
/// PIECE OF CODE ///
OWLDataFactory df = Singleton_Ontologia.getFactory();
IRI soccerIRI=IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase(),"Soccer");
IRI paoloIRI = IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase(),"Paolo");
IRI marcoIRI = IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase(),"Marco");
OWLNamedIndividual soccer = df.getOWLNamedIndividual(soccerIRI);
OWLNamedIndividual paolo = df.getOWLNamedIndividual(paoloIRI);
OWLNamedIndividual marco = df.getOWLNamedIndividual(marcoIRI);
OWLClass person = df.getOWLClass(
IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase()+"Person"));
OWLClass individual_activity = df.getOWLClass(
IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase()+"IndividualActivity"));
OWLObjectProperty hasActor = df.getOWLObjectProperty(
IRI.create(Singleton_Ontologia.getIribase()+"hasActor"));
OWLClassAssertionAxiom assertionAxiom = df.getOWLClassAssertionAxiom(individual_activity, soccer);
OWLClassAssertionAxiom assertionAxiom2 = df.getOWLClassAssertionAxiom(person, paolo);
OWLClassAssertionAxiom assertionAxiom3 = df.getOWLClassAssertionAxiom(person, marco);
OWLObjectPropertyAssertionAxiom assertionAxiom4 = df.getOWLObjectPropertyAssertionAxiom(hasActor, soccer, paolo);
OWLObjectPropertyAssertionAxiom assertionAxiom5 = df.getOWLObjectPropertyAssertionAxiom(hasActor, soccer, marco);
Singleton_Ontologia.getManager().addAxiom(ontologiaattuale,assertionAxiom);
Singleton_Ontologia.getManager().addAxiom(ontologiaattuale,assertionAxiom2);
Singleton_Ontologia.getManager().addAxiom(ontologiaattuale,assertionAxiom3);
Singleton_Ontologia.getManager().addAxiom(ontologiaattuale,assertionAxiom4);
Singleton_Ontologia.getManager().addAxiom(ontologiaattuale,assertionAxiom5);
/// CONSISTENCY CHECK ///
System.out.println("Consistency:"+Singleton_Ontologia.getReasoner().isConsistent());
and here is the configuration of Hermit reasoner:
public static void configReasoner() {
iribase = "http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#";
Configuration config=new Configuration();
config.ignoreUnsupportedDatatypes=true;
factory = manager.getOWLDataFactory();
reasonerFactory = new ReasonerFactory();
reasoner = reasonerFactory.createReasoner(ont,config);
}
I created the individuals Paolo and Marco in order to create more than 1 Person
being Actors
of Soccer
but the isConsistent()
method still returns true while i expected a false value.
In addition, i printed the ABOX content:
___________ABOX___________
/////////////////////// OBJECT number 1 ///////////////////////
ClassAssertion(<http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#IndividualActivity> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Soccer>)
/////////////////////// OBJECT number 2 ///////////////////////
ClassAssertion(<http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Person> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Paolo>)
/////////////////////// OBJECT number 3 ///////////////////////
ObjectPropertyAssertion(<http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#hasActor> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Soccer> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Paolo>)
/////////////////////// OBJECT number 4 ///////////////////////
ObjectPropertyAssertion(<http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#hasActor > <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Soccer> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Marco>)
/////////////////////// OBJECT number 5 ///////////////////////
ClassAssertion(<http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Person> <http://webmind.dico.unimi.it/CARE/locont.owl#Marco>)
___________END_ABOX___________
Honestly, i can't understand where my error is, may anyone help me?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 230
Reputation: 768
You need to specify that Marco and Paolo are different individuals. Without this axiom nothing prevents them to be the same one and keep the ontology consistent.
Upvotes: 2