Reputation: 7486
Is it possible to use atom as both operator and predicate. Something along the lines :
:- op(101, fy, rule).
:- op(99, xfy, ==>).
rule(R) :- write_canonical(R).
So that I can say :
rule ...blah... ==> ...abc..
instead of :
rule( ...blah... ==> ...abc.).
Upvotes: 0
Views: 63
Reputation: 7486
As lurker said, the problem was resolved when I set correct precedence.
In your specific case it will depend what else you have defined and how do you use it.
To check for conflicting precedence use current_op/3.
Upvotes: 1