Reputation: 31
I have tried to follow this tutorial to fit a curve to my dataset. The equation for the curve should be
f(t) = log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2)) +
((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t) +
(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t)).
I have created the following code:
clock='atomicclockgpsworld.txt';
data=importdata(clock);
carrier=10e6;
sig=data(:,2);
t=data(:,1);
sigsq=log10(sig.^2);
fun = @(coeff)sseval(coeff,t,sigsq);
x0 = rand(5,1);
bestx = fminsearch(fun,x0);
wpmcoeff = bestx(1);
fpmcoeff = bestx(2);
wfmcoeff = bestx(3);
ffmcoeff = bestx(4);
rwfmcoeff = bestx(5);
yfit=log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2))+((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t))+(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t);
semilogx(t,sigsq,'x');
hold on
semilogx(t,yfit);
saveas(gcf,'fit','png');
and the corresponding function
function sse = sseval(coeff,t,sigsq)
wpmcoeff = coeff(1);
fpmcoeff = coeff(2);
wfmcoeff = coeff(3);
ffmcoeff = coeff(4);
rwfmcoeff = coeff(5);
sse = sum(sigsq - (log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2))+((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t)+(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t))));
end
But the fit produced is horrible (my y data should vary between approximately -20 to -22 but the fit produces a curve that reaches 1e59!). Can anyone suggest where I may be going wrong?
Current output vs data:
Upvotes: 3
Views: 683
Reputation: 1868
In your function sseval
the function is different then the one in your first script. In the function you take the log10
of the whole equation, while in the script log10
stops at (wfmcoeff./t)
:
first script:
log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2))+((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t))+(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t)
function:
log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2))+((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t)+(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t))
A second thing is that you didn't take the square of the difference. So in your function change the last line to
sse = sum((sigsq - (log10((wpmcoeff./(t.^2))+((1.038+3.*log(2.*pi.*1e6.*t)).*fpmcoeff./(t.^2))+(wfmcoeff./t))+(ffmcoeff)+(rwfmcoeff.*t))).^2);
Note: the fitting is sometimes good, sometimes it's really rubbish, so run the script a couple of times to get a good fitting. After a few times I got the following:
The parameters found are:
wpmcoeff: 10.898483535691309
wfmcoeff: 22.933722400252414
rwfmcoeff: 3.601059651996531e-05
fpmcoeff: -0.324473127267299
ffmcoeff: -21.497862719234053
Upvotes: 3