Reputation: 862
I am tetsing out Redland's Python bindings. From some simple tests, inserting data seems many, many times slower than RDFLib. A simple script such as:
import RDF
h1=RDF.HashStorage(
"/var/tmp/redland.bdb", options="hash-type='bdb', contexts='yes'")
g = RDF.Model(h1)
for i in range(10000):
if i % 100 == 0:
print('Inserting {} triples.'.format(i))
g.append(RDF.Statement(
RDF.Uri('urn:s:{}'.format(i % 1000)),
RDF.Uri('urn:p:{}'.format(i %100)),
RDF.Uri('urn:o:{}'.format(i))))
I am using Python 3.5, Redland 1.0.17 with BDB support (manually compiled).
takes several minutes to run, compared with a few seconds of RDFLib. 10K triples are a small number nowdays, so much that such performance would make the library almost unusable for most production scenarios; so I wonder if I am doing something really wrong here.
Thanks for the help,
Stefano
Upvotes: 1
Views: 54