Reputation: 171
How can I use grep to find two terms / strings in one line?
The output, or an entry in the log file, should only be made if the two terms / strings have been found.
I have made the following attempts:
egrep -n --color '(string1.*string2)' debuglog.log
In this example, everything between the two strings is marked.
But I would like to see only the two found strings marked.
Is that possible?
Maybe you could do this with another tool, I am open for suggestions.
Upvotes: 4
Views: 7573
Reputation: 3417
The simplest solution would be to first select only the lines that contain both strings and then grep twice to color the matches, eg:
egrep 'string1.*string2|string2.*string1' |
egrep -n --color=always 'string1' | egrep --color 'string2'
It is important to set color to always
, otherwise the grep won't output the color information to the pipe.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 37394
I am a little confused of what you really want as there was no sample data or expected output, but:
$ cat foo
1
2
12
21
132
13
And the awk that prints the matching parts of the records:
$ awk '
/1/ && /2/ {
while(match($0,/1|2/)) {
b=b substr($0,RSTART,RLENGTH)
$0=substr($0,RSTART+RLENGTH)
}
print b
b=""
}' foo
12
21
12
but fails with printing overlapping matches.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 784888
Here is single command awk
solution that prefixes and suffixes matched strings with color codes:
awk '/string1.*string2/{
gsub(/string1|string2/, "\033[01;31m\033[K&\033[m"); print}' file
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 5056
I know some people will disagree, but I think the best way is to do it like this :
Lets say this is your input :
$ cat > fruits.txt
apple banana
orange strawberry
coconut watermelon
apple peach
With this code you can get exactly what you need, and the code looks nicer and cleaner :
awk '{ if ( $0 ~ /apple/ && $0 ~ /banana/ )
{
print $0
}
}' fruits.txt
But, as I said before, some people will disagree as its too much typing. ths short way with grep is just concatenate many greps , e.g. :
grep 'apple' fruits.txt | grep 'banana'
Regards!
Upvotes: 2