Reputation: 10546
I've seen a few related questions, but am still just puzzled. What's wrong with this syntax:
boost::function<int (int)> g = f;
boost::function<int (int)> g2 = 2*g(boost::lambda::_1);
I've tried it with boost 1.35 and 1.38 (these are the two installations I have lying around) on gcc 4.3.4, and they both give variations of the error:
no match for call to '(boost::function<int ()(int)>) (const boost::lambda::lambda_functor<boost::lambda::placeholder<1> >&)'
Upvotes: 4
Views: 1259
Reputation: 21
I suggest you give up Boost.Lambda
as it’s out of date. The compiler which supports C++0x provides native lambda and is easier to understand. You can use GCC with 4.4 or higher version, Visual Studio 2010 also supports C++0x.
Upvotes: 2