CODEWITHSUNDEEP
phproutessymfony
umpirsky
umpirsky

Reputation: 10024

Routing in Symfony2

How to setup default routing in Symfony2?

In Symfony1 it looked something like this:

homepage:
  url:   /
  param: { module: default, action: index }

default_symfony:
  url:   /symfony/:action/...
  param: { module: default }

default_index:
  url:   /:module
  param: { action: index }

default:
  url:   /:module/:action/...

Upvotes: 25

Views: 24310

Answers (10)

luminol
luminol

Reputation: 425

It depends... Some of mine look like this: 

api_email:
resource: "@MApiBundle/Resources/config/routing_email.yml"
prefix: /

and some look like 

api_images:
path:     /images/{listingId}/{width}/{fileName}
defaults: { _controller: ApiBundle:Image:view, listingId: null, width: null, fileName: null }
methods:  [GET]
requirements:
    fileName: .+

Upvotes: 0

Longsight
Longsight

Reputation: 716

I was looking through the cookbook for an answer to this, and think I've found it here. By default, all route parameters have a hidden requirement that they match any character except the / character ([^/]+), but this behaviour can be overridden with the requirements keyword, by forcing it to match any character.

The following should create a default route that catches all others - and as such, should come last in your routing config, as any following routes will never match. To ensure it matches "/" as well, a default value for the url parameter is included.

default_route:
    pattern: /{url}
    defaults: { _controller: AcmeBundle:Default:index, url: "index" }
    requirements:
        url: ".+"

Upvotes: 28

mevdschee
mevdschee

Reputation: 1714

Symfony2 standard routing component does not support it, but this bundle fills the gap Symfony1 left:

https://github.com/LeaseWeb/LswDefaultRoutingBundle

It does what you expect. You can default route a bundle using this syntax:

FosUserBundle:
  resource: "@FosUserBundle"
  prefix:   /
  type:     default

It scans your bundle and automatically adds routes to your router table that you can debug by executing:

app/console router:debug

Example of automatically added default routes:

[router] Current routes
Name                          Method Pattern
fos_user.user.login_check     ANY    /user/login_check.{_format}
fos_user.user.logout          ANY    /user/logout.{_format}
fos_user.user.login           ANY    /user/login.{_format}
...

You see that it also supports the automatic "format" selection by using a file extension (html, json or xml).

Upvotes: 4

D H
D H

Reputation: 11

If you want to create a "catch all", your best bet would be to hook on the KernelEvents::EXCEPTION event. This event gets triggered whenever an Exception falls through to the HttpKernel, this includes the NotFoundHttpException thrown when the router cannot resolve a route to a Controller.

The effect would be similar to Symfony's stylized 404 page that gets rendered when you send the request through app_dev.php. Instead of returning a 404, you perform whatever logic you're looking to.

Upvotes: 1

Crozin
Crozin

Reputation: 44376

Here is an example: http://docs.symfony-reloaded.org/master/quick_tour/the_big_picture.html#routing

A route definition has only one mandatory parameter pattern and three optionals parameters defaults, requirements and options.

Here's a route from my own project:

video:
    pattern:  /watch/{id}/{slug}
    defaults: { _controller: SiteBundle:Video:watch }
    requirements: { id: "\d+", slug: "[\w-]+"

Upvotes: 3

Marc Morera Merino
Marc Morera Merino

Reputation: 159

Create a default route is not a good way of programming. Why? Because for this reason was implemented Exception. Symfony2 is built just to do right things in the right way.

If you want to redirect all "not found" routes you should use exception, like NotFound404 or something similar. You can even customise this page at your own.

One route is for one purpose. Always. Other think is bad.

Upvotes: 2

MFoster
MFoster

Reputation: 11

You could create your own bundle that handled all requests and used URL parameters to construct a string to pass to the controller's forward method. But that's pretty crappy, I'd go with well defined routes, it keeps your URLs cleaner, and decouples the URL and controller names. If you rename a bundle or something, do you then have to refactor your URLs?

Upvotes: 1

ken
ken

Reputation: 5086

Alternatively, you can use @Route annotation directly in a controller file. see https://github.com/sensio/SensioFrameworkExtraBundle/blob/master/Resources/doc/annotations/routing.rst

As for the default routes, I think Symfony2 encourages explicit route mapping.

Upvotes: 2

Denis Gorbachev
Denis Gorbachev

Reputation: 507

// Symfony2 PR10

in routing.yml:

default:
    pattern:  /{_controller}

It enables you to use this kind of urls: http://localhost/MySuperBundle:MyController:myview

Upvotes: 8

dxb
dxb

Reputation: 931

I don't think it's possible with the standard routing component. Take a look to this bundle, it might help : https://github.com/hidenorigoto/DefaultRouteBundle

Upvotes: 8

Related Questions