Reputation: 22481
I have the following trait and class (actually this is a simplification, the real code is written in Java and is outside of my control):
trait BusinessTermValue {
def getValue: Any
}
class BusinessTermValueImpl(override val getValue: Any) extends BusinessTermValue
Now I'm trying to improve my API without touching the original code (Pimp My Library pattern):
package object businessterms {
implicit final class BusinessTermValueSupport(val btv: BusinessTermValue) extends AnyVal {
def isDefined(): Boolean = btv != null && btv.value != null
def isEmpty(): Boolean = isDefined() && (btv.value match {
case s: String => s.isEmpty
case l: Traversable[_] => l.isEmpty
case c: java.util.Collection[_] => c.isEmpty
case _ => false
})
def getAs[T](): T = btv.value.asInstanceOf[T]
}
object BusinessTerm {
def apply(value: Any): BusinessTermValue = new BusinessTermValueImpl(value)
}
}
It works quite well:
println(BusinessTerm("A String").isEmpty) // false
println(BusinessTerm(1).isEmpty) // false, Int can't be empty
println(BusinessTerm(new Integer(1)).isEmpty) // false, Integer can't be empty
println(BusinessTerm(List(1, 2, 3)).isEmpty) // false
println(BusinessTerm(List(1, 2, 3).asJava).isEmpty) // false
println(BusinessTerm("").isEmpty) // true
println(BusinessTerm(List()).isEmpty) // true
println(BusinessTerm(Seq()).isEmpty) // true
println(BusinessTerm(Map()).isEmpty) // true
println(BusinessTerm(List().asJava).isEmpty) // true
Still the pattern matching in isEmpty
is cumbersome. Ideally I would like to use structural types and make sure that any type that implements isEmpty
works with my API.
Unfortunately the code below doesn't work. The variable e
matches any type, even when value
does not define isEmpty
:
def isEmpty(): Boolean = isDefined() && (btv.value match {
case e: { def isEmpty(): Boolean } => e.isEmpty
case _ => false
})
Is there a way to delegate isEmpty
only when the underlying value
implements it?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 1582
Reputation: 4839
I was the one suggesting the Try version
def isEmpty(): Boolean = isDefined && (btv.value match {
case e: { def isEmpty(): Boolean } => Try(e.isEmpty).getOrElse(false)
case _ => false
})
I also noted that catching exceptions is expensive but I believe that this case would be the least common as in principle you would be using this construct when you expect to have an isEmpty method. So I think the trade-off may pay and would consider this a case of defensive coding.
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 44967
Since the Java class that is not under your control returns Any
/Object
, you don't have any compile-time type safety anyway, so you don't lose anything by using reflection directly.
Here is an isEmpty
implementation that works with Java-reflection. It's implemented as a function, but it should be trivial to change it into a method of your wrapper class:
def isEmpty(a: Any): Boolean = {
try {
a.getClass.getMethod("isEmpty").invoke(a).asInstanceOf[Boolean]
} catch {
case e: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException => false
}
}
Here are a few examples:
println(isEmpty("hello"))
println(isEmpty(""))
println(isEmpty(List(1,2,3)))
println(isEmpty(Nil))
println(isEmpty(0 to 10))
println(isEmpty(42 until 42))
println(isEmpty(Some(42)))
println(isEmpty(None))
println(isEmpty((x: Int) => x * x))
It prints false
/true
in an alternating manner. It does not throw any nasty exceptions if it gets an object that has no isEmpty
method, as the last example demonstrates.
EDIT
A more robust version would be this:
def isEmpty(a: Any): Boolean = {
try {
val m = a.getClass.getMethod("isEmpty")
if (m.getParameterCount == 0) {
m.invoke(a).asInstanceOf[Boolean]
} else {
false
}
} catch {
case e: java.lang.NoSuchMethodException => false
case e: java.lang.ClassCastException => false
}
}
It guards against the cases that isEmpty
is not nullary, and that it doesn't return a Boolean
. However, it's still not "perfect", because it could happen that the method isEmpty
is overloaded. Maybe org.apache.commons.lang3.reflect
could come in handy.
Upvotes: 1