Reputation: 3049
Question: Is it required to have .gz
extension for child sitemaps or not?
This is what I found:
Google provides the following sitemap index example:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9">
<sitemap>
<loc>http://www.example.com/sitemap1.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2004-10-01T18:23:17+00:00</lastmod>
</sitemap>
<sitemap>
<loc>http://www.example.com/sitemap2.xml.gz</loc>
<lastmod>2005-01-01</lastmod>
</sitemap>
</sitemapindex>
Very similar example can be found on sitemaps.org. As per sitemaps.org:
<loc>
- Identifies the location of the Sitemap. This location can be a Sitemap, an Atom file, RSS file or a simple text file.
Both examples don't specify anything about .gz
and I couldn't find any sitemap index example that doesn't contain .gz
. However, all child sitemaps in my case are not gzipped and I'm wondering whether it's right way of doing it or not.
Upvotes: 4
Views: 2936
Reputation: 448
No, gzipping the files is not necessary. From the Sitemaps.org Protocol:
If you would like, you may compress your Sitemap files using gzip to reduce your bandwidth requirement…
Google themselves reference uncompressed Sitemap files: https://www.google.com/sitemap.xml
Upvotes: 3