CODEWITHSUNDEEP
cposix
user7659542
user7659542

Reputation:

How to know to which value I should define _POSIX_C_SOURCE?

Let's say for instance I want to use the structure timespec, which is defined in time.h. According to the manpages I only need to include time.h. But when compiling in c99, this isn't enough:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>

struct timespec abcd;

int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
   return 0;
}

According to the info I find online (not in the manpages), I need to add this:

#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L

So I have a few questions:

#include <stdio.h>

#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L

#include <time.h>

struct timespec abcd;

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { return 0; }

$ gcc test.c -Wall -Wpedantic -std=c99 -o test test.c:9:25: error: field ‘time_last_package’ has incomplete type struct timespec time_last_package;

compiles well:

#define _POSIX_C_SOURCE 200809L
#include <stdio.h>
#include <time.h>
....

Thanks

Upvotes: 13

Views: 3040

Answers (2)

kbolino
kbolino

Reputation: 1744

The other answer gives nice background. But, it's also possible to define this at the compiler level so you don't have to put it in your source. With gcc and glibc at least, the command-line option

-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=199309L

is enough to ensure that nanosleep and struct timespec are available if you include <time.h>.

Upvotes: 1

Jean-Baptiste Yun&#232;s
Jean-Baptiste Yun&#232;s

Reputation: 36431

  • How do I know to which value I need _POSIX_C_SOURCE to be equal? I found multiple values online.

There is one value per POSIX standard definition. So you can use any value which:

  1. defines the functionality you need
  2. is supported by your hosting OS

Best is to use the lowest value that meet both those criteria.

  • Why does the placement of this definition influence the compilation?

POSIX says :

System Interface Chapter 2. Section 2 The Compilation Environment: A POSIX-conforming application should ensure that the feature test macro _POSIX_C_SOURCE is defined before inclusion of any header.

Otherwise it may leads to wrong/incompatible included definitions... Defining it before any include ensure that all is under the same POSIX version...

Recommended reading : The Open Group Base Specifications Issue 7, 2018 edition, 2 - General Information

Upvotes: 6

Related Questions