Reputation: 105
I have a list of approximately a thousand Java objects and am iterating a List
container to process them, the same processing for every object. This sequential approach is taking a lot of time for processing, so I want to attempt to speed it up with parallel processing. I checked Java executor frameworks but got stuck.
I thought of one approach to implement my requirement. I want to specify some minimum fixed number of objects to be processed by each thread so that each does its processing in a quick manner. How can I achieve this? Should I use another approach?
For example:
List<Object> objects = new List<Object>();
for (Object object : objects) {
// Doing some common operation for all Objects
}
Upvotes: 8
Views: 28918
Reputation: 101
Split list into multiple sub-lists and use multi threading to process each sub-lists parallel.
public class ParallelProcessListElements {
public void processList (int numberofthreads,List<Object>tempList,
Object obj, Method method){
final int sizeofList=tempList.size();
final int sizeofsublist = sizeofList/numberofthreads;
List<Thread> threadlist = new ArrayList<Thread>();
for(int i=0;i<numberofthreads;i++) {
int firstindex = i*sizeofsublist;
int lastindex = i*sizeofsublist+sizeofsublist;
if(i==numberofthreads-1)
lastindex=sizeofList;
List<Object> subList=tempList.subList(firstindex,lastindex );
Thread th = new Thread(()->{
try{method.invoke(obj, subList);}catch(Exception e) {e.printStackTrace();}
});
threadlist.add(th);
}
threadlist.forEach(th->{th.start();try{Thread.sleep(10);}catch(Exception e) {}});
}
}
public class Demo {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Object> tempList= new ArrayList<Object>();
/**
* Adding values to list... For Demo purpose..
*/
for(int i=0;i<500;i++)
tempList.add(i);
ParallelProcessListElements process = new ParallelProcessListElements();
final int numberofthreads = 5;
Object obj = new Demo();
Method method=null;
try{ method=Demo.class.getMethod("printList", List.class);}catch(Exception e) {}
/**
* Method Call...
*/
process.processList(numberofthreads,tempList,obj,method);
}
public void printList(List<Integer>list) {
/**
* Business logic to process the list...
*/
list.forEach(item->{
try{Thread.sleep(1000);}catch(Exception e) {}
System.out.println(item);
});
}
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 28279
You can use a ThreadPoolExecutor
, it will take care of load balance. Tasks will be distributed on different threads.
Here is an example:
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Fixed thread number
ExecutorService service = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
// Or un fixed thread number
// The number of threads will increase with tasks
// ExecutorService service = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(10);
List<Object> objects = new ArrayList<>();
for (Object o : objects) {
service.execute(new MyTask(o));
}
// shutdown
// this will get blocked until all task finish
service.shutdown();
try {
service.awaitTermination(Long.MAX_VALUE, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
public static class MyTask implements Runnable {
Object target;
public MyTask(Object target) {
this.target = target;
}
@Override
public void run() {
// business logic at here
}
}
}
Upvotes: 9
Reputation: 45319
There are many options for processing a list in parallel:
Use a parallel stream:
objects.stream().parallel().forEach(object -> {
//Your work on each object goes here, using object
})
Use an executor service to submit tasks if you want to use a pool with more threads than the fork-join pool:
ExecutorService es = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(10);
for(Object o: objects) {
es.submit(() -> {
//code here using Object o...
}
}
This preceding example is essentially the same as the traditional executor service, running tasks on separate threads.
As an alternative to these, you can also submit using the completable future:
//You can also just run a for-each and manually add each
//feature to a list
List<CompletableFuture<Void>> futures =
objects.stream().map(object -> CompletableFuture.runAsync(() -> {
//Your work on each object goes here, using object
})
You can then use the futures
object to check the status of each execution if that's required.
Upvotes: 12