Reputation: 2025
I have next use case: User comes to registration form, enters name, email and password and clicks on register button. After that system needs to check if email is taken or not and based on that show error message or create new user...
I am trying to do that using Room, ViewModel and LiveData. This is some project that on which I try to learn these components and I do not have remote api, I will store everything in local database
So I have these classes:
So the idea that I have is that there will be listener attached to register button which will call RegisterViewModel::register()
method.
class RegisterViewModel extends ViewModel {
//...
public void register() {
validationErrorMessage.setValue(null);
if(!validateInput())
return;
registrationService.performRegistration(name.get(), email.get(), password.get());
}
//...
}
So that is the basic idea, I also want for performRegistration
to return to me newly created user.
The thing that bothers me the most is I do not know how to implement performRegistration
function in the service
class UsersRegistrationService {
private UsersRepository usersRepo;
//...
public LiveData<RegistrationResponse<Parent>> performRegistration(String name, String email, String password) {
// 1. check if email exists using repository
// 2. if user exists return RegistrationResponse.error("Email is taken")
// 3. if user does not exists create new user and return RegistrationResponse(newUser)
}
}
As I understand, methods that are in UsersRepository
should return LiveData because UsersDAO
is returning LiveData
@Dao
abstract class UsersDAO {
@Query("SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = :email LIMIT 1")
abstract LiveData<User> getUserByEmail(String email);
}
class UsersRepository {
//...
public LiveData<User> findUserByEmail(String email) {
return this.usersDAO.getUserByEmail(email);
}
}
So my problem is how to implement performRegistration()
function and how to pass value back to view model and then how to change activity from RegisterActivity to MainActivity...
Upvotes: 61
Views: 59995
Reputation: 815
I get that having a combine method would be really convenient, but your intended functionality can easily be achieved in a more rustic way:
Define your liveData
private val liveDataA = MutableLiveData<String>()
private val liveDataB = MutableLiveData<String>()
private val liveDataC = MutableLiveData<String>()
Define your onData method in the fragment/activity
private fun onData() {
val dataA = viewModel.liveDataA.value ?: return
val dataB = viewModel.liveDataB.value ?: return
val dataC = viewModel.liveDataC.value ?: return
// DoStuff with non-null values
}
Observe your livedatas
observe(viewModel.liveDataA) {
onData()
}
observe(viewModel.liveDataB) {
onData()
}
observe(viewModel.liveDataC) {
onData()
}
It's clunky, yes, but it works
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 403
Java version, if anyone else is stuck working on some old project
var fullNameLiveData = LiveDataCombiner.combine(
nameLiveData,
surnameLiveData,
(name, surname) -> name + surname
)
public class LiveDataCombiner<First, Second, Combined> {
private First first;
private Second second;
private final MediatorLiveData<Combined> combined = new MediatorLiveData<>();
private final BiFunction<First, Second, Combined> combine;
public LiveData<Combined> getCombined() {
return combined;
}
public static <First, Second, Combined>LiveDataCombiner<First, Second, Combined> combine(
LiveData<First> firstData,
LiveData<Second> secondData,
BiFunction<First, Second, Combined> combine
) {
return new LiveDataCombiner<>(firstData, secondData, combine);
}
private LiveDataCombiner(
LiveData<First> firstData,
LiveData<Second> secondData,
BiFunction<First, Second, Combined> combine
) {
this.combine = combine;
addSource(firstData, value -> first = value);
addSource(secondData, value -> second = value);
}
private <T> void addSource(LiveData<T> source, Consumer<T> setValue) {
combined.addSource(source, second -> {
setValue.accept(second);
emit(combine());
});
}
private Combined combine() {
return combine.apply(first, second);
}
private void emit(Combined value) {
if (combined.getValue() != value)
combined.setValue(value);
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 305
Solved with LiveData extensions
fun <T, R> LiveData<T>.map(action: (t: T) -> R): LiveData<R> =
Transformations.map(this, action)
fun <T1, T2, R> LiveData<T1>.combine(
liveData: LiveData<T2>,
action: (t1: T1?, t2: T2?) -> R
): LiveData<R> =
MediatorLiveData<Pair<T1?, T2?>>().also { med ->
med.addSource(this) { med.value = it to med.value?.second }
med.addSource(liveData) { med.value = med.value?.first to it }
}.map { action(it.first, it.second) }
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 17284
One approach is to use flows for this.
val profile = MutableLiveData<ProfileData>()
val user = MutableLiveData<CurrentUser>()
val titleFlow = profile.asFlow().combine(user.asFlow()){ profile, user ->
"${profile.job} ${user.name}"
}
And then your Fragment/Activity:
viewLifecycleOwner.lifecycleScope.launch {
viewModel.titleFlow.collectLatest { title ->
Log.d(">>", title)
}
}
One advantage to this approach is that titleFlow
will only emit value when both live datas have emitted at least one value. This interactive diagram will help you understand this https://rxmarbles.com/#combineLatest
Alternative syntax:
val titleFlow = combine(profile.asFlow(), user.asFlow()){ profile, user ->
"${profile.job} ${user.name}"
}
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 6636
With the help of MediatorLiveData, you can combine results from multiple sources. Here an example of how would I combine two sources:
class CombinedLiveData<T, K, S>(source1: LiveData<T>, source2: LiveData<K>, private val combine: (data1: T?, data2: K?) -> S) : MediatorLiveData<S>() {
private var data1: T? = null
private var data2: K? = null
init {
super.addSource(source1) {
data1 = it
value = combine(data1, data2)
}
super.addSource(source2) {
data2 = it
value = combine(data1, data2)
}
}
override fun <S : Any?> addSource(source: LiveData<S>, onChanged: Observer<in S>) {
throw UnsupportedOperationException()
}
override fun <T : Any?> removeSource(toRemove: LiveData<T>) {
throw UnsupportedOperationException()
}
}
here is the gist for above, in case it is updated on the future: https://gist.github.com/guness/0a96d80bc1fb969fa70a5448aa34c215
Upvotes: 37
Reputation: 2408
Many of these answers work, but also it is assumed the LiveData generic types are not-nullable.
But what if one or more of the given input types are nullable types (given the default Kotlin upper bound for generics is Any?
, which is nullable)?
The result would be even though the LiveData emitter would emit a value (null
), the MediatorLiveData will ignore it, thinking it's his own child live data value not being set.
This solution, instead, takes care of it by forcing the upper bound of the types passed to the mediator to be not null. Lazy but needed.
Also, this implementation avoids same-value after the combiner function has been called, which might or might not be what you need, so feel free to remove the equality check there.
fun <T1 : Any, T2 : Any, R> combineLatest(
liveData1: LiveData<T1>,
liveData2: LiveData<T2>,
combiner: (T1, T2) -> R,
): LiveData<R> = MediatorLiveData<R>().apply {
var first: T1? = null
var second: T2? = null
fun updateValueIfNeeded() {
value = combiner(
first ?: return,
second ?: return,
)?.takeIf { it != value } ?: return
}
addSource(liveData1) {
first = it
updateValueIfNeeded()
}
addSource(liveData2) {
second = it
updateValueIfNeeded()
}
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 4438
without custom class
MediatorLiveData<Pair<Foo?, Bar?>>().apply {
addSource(fooLiveData) { value = it to value?.second }
addSource(barLiveData) { value = value?.first to it }
}.observe(this) { pair ->
// TODO
}
Upvotes: 11
Reputation: 76506
If you want to create a field and setup at construction time (use also
):
val liveData1 = MutableLiveData(false)
val liveData2 = MutableLiveData(false)
// Return true if liveData1 && liveData2 are true
val liveDataCombined = MediatorLiveData<Boolean>().also {
// Initial value
it.value = false
// Observing changes
it.addSource(liveData1) { newValue ->
it.value = newValue && liveData2.value!!
}
it.addSource(selectedAddOn) { newValue ->
it.value = liveData1.value!! && newValue
}
}
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 431
if you want both value not null
fun <T, V, R> LiveData<T>.combineWithNotNull(
liveData: LiveData<V>,
block: (T, V) -> R
): LiveData<R> {
val result = MediatorLiveData<R>()
result.addSource(this) {
this.value?.let { first ->
liveData.value?.let { second ->
result.value = block(first, second)
}
}
}
result.addSource(liveData) {
this.value?.let { first ->
liveData.value?.let { second ->
result.value = block(first, second)
}
}
}
return result
}
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 1427
You can use my helper method:
val profile = MutableLiveData<ProfileData>()
val user = MutableLiveData<CurrentUser>()
val title = profile.combineWith(user) { profile, user ->
"${profile.job} ${user.name}"
}
fun <T, K, R> LiveData<T>.combineWith(
liveData: LiveData<K>,
block: (T?, K?) -> R
): LiveData<R> {
val result = MediatorLiveData<R>()
result.addSource(this) {
result.value = block(this.value, liveData.value)
}
result.addSource(liveData) {
result.value = block(this.value, liveData.value)
}
return result
}
Upvotes: 121
Reputation: 81549
You can define a method that would combine multiple LiveDatas using a MediatorLiveData, then expose this combined result as a tuple.
public class CombinedLiveData2<A, B> extends MediatorLiveData<Pair<A, B>> {
private A a;
private B b;
public CombinedLiveData2(LiveData<A> ld1, LiveData<B> ld2) {
setValue(Pair.create(a, b));
addSource(ld1, (a) -> {
if(a != null) {
this.a = a;
}
setValue(Pair.create(a, b));
});
addSource(ld2, (b) -> {
if(b != null) {
this.b = b;
}
setValue(Pair.create(a, b));
});
}
}
If you need more values, then you can create a CombinedLiveData3<A,B,C>
and expose a Triple<A,B,C>
instead of the Pair, etc. Just like in https://stackoverflow.com/a/54292960/2413303 .
EDIT: hey look, I even made a library for you that does that from 2 arity up to 16: https://github.com/Zhuinden/livedata-combinetuple-kt
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 5503
I did an approach based on @guness answer. I found that being limited to two LiveData
s was not good. What if we want to use 3? We need to create different classes for every case. So, I created a class that handles an unlimited amount of LiveData
s.
/**
* CombinedLiveData is a helper class to combine results from multiple LiveData sources.
* @param liveDatas Variable number of LiveData arguments.
* @param combine Function reference that will be used to combine all LiveData data results.
* @param R The type of data returned after combining all LiveData data.
* Usage:
* CombinedLiveData<SomeType>(
* getLiveData1(),
* getLiveData2(),
* ... ,
* getLiveDataN()
* ) { datas: List<Any?> ->
* // Use datas[0], datas[1], ..., datas[N] to return a SomeType value
* }
*/
class CombinedLiveData<R>(vararg liveDatas: LiveData<*>,
private val combine: (datas: List<Any?>) -> R) : MediatorLiveData<R>() {
private val datas: MutableList<Any?> = MutableList(liveDatas.size) { null }
init {
for(i in liveDatas.indices){
super.addSource(liveDatas[i]) {
datas[i] = it
value = combine(datas)
}
}
}
}
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1672
LiveData liveData1 = ...;
LiveData liveData2 = ...;
MediatorLiveData liveDataMerger = new MediatorLiveData<>();
liveDataMerger.addSource(liveData1, value -> liveDataMerger.setValue(value));
liveDataMerger.addSource(liveData2, value -> liveDataMerger.setValue(value));
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 19824
Jose Alcérreca has probably the best answer for this:
fun blogpostBoilerplateExample(newUser: String): LiveData<UserDataResult> {
val liveData1 = userOnlineDataSource.getOnlineTime(newUser)
val liveData2 = userCheckinsDataSource.getCheckins(newUser)
val result = MediatorLiveData<UserDataResult>()
result.addSource(liveData1) { value ->
result.value = combineLatestData(liveData1, liveData2)
}
result.addSource(liveData2) { value ->
result.value = combineLatestData(liveData1, liveData2)
}
return result
}
Upvotes: 9