Reputation: 365
I've got a query that normally looks like
def get_models_with_children(ids):
query = MyModel.query.filter(MyModel.id.in_(ids))
.join(Child, Child.parent_id = Child.id)
.groupBy(MyModel.id)
.having(func.count(Child.id) > 0)
return query.all()
Sometimes, I want to actually retrieve the count, as well. I can make that happen easily enough:
def get_models_with_children(ids, return_count):
query = MyModel.query
if return_count:
query = query.add_columns(func.count(Child.id).label("child_count"))
query = query.filter(MyModel.id.in_(ids))
.join(Child, Child.parent_id = Child.id)
.groupBy(MyModel.id)
.having(func.count(Child.id) > 0)
return query.all()
This works fine, but now, instead of a List[MyModel]
coming back, I've got a differently shaped result with MyModel
and child_count
keys. If I want the MyModel's id, I do result[0].id
if I didn't add the count, and result[0].MyModel.id
if I did.
Is there any way I can flatten the result, so that the thing that's returned looks like a MyModel
with an extra child_count
column?
def do_stuff_with_models():
result = get_models_with_children([1, 2, 3], True)
for r in result:
# can't do this, but I want to:
print(r.id)
print(r.child_count)
# instead I have to do this:
print(r.MyModel.id)
print(r.child_count)
Upvotes: 2
Views: 3534
Reputation: 25273
sqlalchemy.util.KeyedTuple
is the type * of differently shaped result with MyModel
and child_count
keys:
Result rows returned by
Query
that contain multiple ORM entities and/or column expressions make use of this class to return rows.
You can effectively flatten them by explictly specifying the columns for your query. Here follows a complete example (tested on SQLAlchemy==1.3.12
).
Models:
import sqlalchemy as sa
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
Base = declarative_base()
class User(Base):
__tablename__ = 'user'
user_id = sa.Column(sa.Integer, sa.Sequence('user_id_seq'), primary_key=True)
username = sa.Column(sa.String(80), unique=True, nullable=False)
def __repr__(self):
return f'User({self.user_id!r}, {self.username!r})'
class Token(Base):
__tablename__ = 'token'
token_id = sa.Column(sa.Integer, sa.Sequence('token_id_seq'), primary_key=True)
user_id = sa.Column(sa.Integer, sa.ForeignKey('user.user_id'), nullable=False)
user = sa.orm.relationship('User')
value = sa.Column(sa.String(120), nullable=False)
def __repr__(self):
return f'Token({self.user.username!r}, {self.value!r})'
Connect and fill some data:
engine = sa.create_engine('sqlite://')
Base.metadata.create_all(engine)
Session = sa.orm.sessionmaker(bind=engine)
session = Session()
user1 = User(username='joe')
user2 = User(username='john')
token1 = Token(user=user1, value='q1w2e3r4t56')
session.add_all([user1, user2, token1])
session.commit()
Now, let's define the "virtual" column as whether user has a token:
query = session.query(User)
exists = (
sa.exists()
.where(User.user_id == Token.user_id)
.correlate(User)
.label("has_token")
)
query = query.add_columns(exists)
query.all() # [(User(1, 'joe'), True), (User(2, 'john'), False)]
It's the undesired shape. And here's how to flatten it:
query = session.query(*[getattr(User, n) for n in User.__table__.columns.keys()])
query = query.add_columns(exists)
query.all() # [(1, 'joe', True), (2, 'john', False)]
It's all possible to define columns for an existing query, given that you know the model:
query = session.query(User)
# later down the line
query = query.with_entities(*[
getattr(User, n) for n in User.__table__.columns.keys()])
query = query.add_columns(exists)
query.all() # [(1, 'joe', True), (2, 'john', False)]
The same can be achieved with sqlalchemy.orm.Bundle
and passing single_entity
to it.
bundle = sa.orm.Bundle(
'UserBundle', User.user_id, User.username, exists, single_entity=True)
query = session.query(bundle)
query.all() # [(1, 'joe', True), (2, 'john', False)]
With complex models it gets complicated. It's possible to inspect the model (mapped class) attributes with sqlalchemy.orm.mapper.Mapper.attrs
and take class_attribute
:
# replace
[getattr(User, n) for n in User.__table__.columns.keys()]
# with
[mp.class_attribute for mp in sa.inspect(User).attrs]
But in this case relationship
attributes turn into their target tables in FROM
clause of the query without ON
clause, effectively producing a cartesian product. And the "joins" have to be defined manually, so it's not a good solution. See this answer and a SQLAlchemy user group discussion.
Myself I ended up using query expressions, because of the issues with relationships in existing code. It's possible to get away with minimal modification of the model, with query-time SQL expressions as mapped attributes.
User.has_tokens = sa.orm.query_expression()
...
query = query.options(sa.orm.with_expression(User.has_tokens, exists))
query.all() # [User(1, 'joe'), User(2, 'john')]
[u.has_tokens for u in query.all()] # [True, False]
* Actually it's generated on-the-fly sqlalchemy.util._collections.result
with MRO of sqlalchemy.util._collections.result
, sqlalchemy.util._collections._LW
, class sqlalchemy.util._collections.AbstractKeyedTuple
, tuple
, object
, but that's details. More details on how the class is created with lightweight_named_tuple
are available in this answer.
Upvotes: 1