Reputation: 14166
I have a common set of email classes used in an Application
instance. They all share the same interface, but I need to be able to (optionally) "shim-in" an instance of another "common" type as a property.
START HERE: Given this starting point...
Notice, MyApplication starts-off with all 3 properties. And, since DistributionListProvider is the only IInstanceProvider configured...no issues arise.
public class MyApplication : IMyApplication
{
#region notifications
[SetterProperty]
public IEmailNotification RequestToFlowEmailNotification { get; set; }
[SetterProperty]
public IEmailNotification ApprovalToFlowEmailNotification{ get; set; }
#endregion
#region instance providers
[SetterProperty]
public IInstanceProvider DistributionListProvider { get; set; }
#endregion
}
public class RequestToFlowEmailNotification : IEmailNotification
{
#region <Properties>
[SetterProperty]
public IInstanceProvider DistributionListProvider { get; set; }
#endregion
}
public class ApprovalToFlowEmailNotification : IEmailNotification
{
}
public class DistributionListProvider : ComponentProviderBase, IInstanceProvider
{
}
LETS ADD: Now lets create another IInstanceProvider & add it to the APPLICATION...
But first, notice that IEmailNotification & IInstanceProvider are common types & not "generic types"...meaning they are not EmailNotificationFor<T>
types. This makes a difference in how you configure them in the Registry.
// NOW...LETS ADD THIS !!
public class AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentRecallProvider : ComponentProviderBase, IInstanceProvider
{
}
public class MyApplication : IMyApplication
{
#region notifications
[SetterProperty]
public IEmailNotification RequestToFlowEmailNotification { get; set; }
[SetterProperty]
public IEmailNotification ApprovalToFlowEmailNotification{ get; set; }
#endregion
#region instance providers
[SetterProperty]
public IInstanceProvider DistributionListProvider { get; set; }
[SetterProperty]
public IInstanceProvider AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentRecallProvider{ get; set; }
#endregion
}
At this point StructureMap NO LONGER UNDERSTANDS how to fill...
Q: How do I update the Registry to force StructureMap to fill correctly?
Below is my entire Registry...
NOTE:
I do NOT wish to set a default...is there a way to do this without setting a DEFAULT?
public ContainerRegistry()
{
Scan(
scan =>
{
scan.TheCallingAssembly();
scan.WithDefaultConventions();
scan.LookForRegistries();
scan.SingleImplementationsOfInterface();
});
// ------------
// UNIT OF WORK
// ------------
// DbContext
For<DbContext>().Use<MeasurementContractsDbContext>();
// UnitOfWork
For<IMeasurementContractsUnitOfWork>().Use<MeasurementContractsUnitOfWork>();
// GenericRepository
For(typeof(ICompositeRepository<>)).Use(typeof(GenericRepository<>));
// --------
// HELPERS
// --------
For<IWindowsIdentityHelper>().Use<WindowsIdentityHelper>();
For<ISmtpClientHelper>().Use<SmtpClientHelper>()
.Ctor<ISmtpClient>().Is(new SmtpClient());
For<IPdfConverterHelper>().Use<PdfConverterHelper>()
.Ctor<IPdfConverterClient>().Is(new SelectPdfUrlConverterClient());
// WARNING: Do not remove without replacing it with "some kind of" IConstructorSelector, so that, Unit Testing can be done
For<IDataServiceFor<EmployeeData>>()
.Use(x => new EmployeeDataService(new ODataProxyV4())); //<-- uses this constructor
// --------
// WORKFLOW
// ---------
For<IWorkflowProvider>().Use<WorkflowProvider>()
.Ctor<Assembly>().Is(Assembly.GetExecutingAssembly());
// --------
// MANAGERS
// --------
For<IManager<Device>>().Use<DeviceManager>();
For<IManager<Favorite>>().Use<FavoritesManager>();
For<IManager<User>>().Use<UserManager>();
// --------
// DEPENDENCY MANAGERS
// --------
For<IDocumentDependency>().Use<DeviceAffinityProvider>();
// --------
// TRANSFORMERS
// --------
For<IXmlTransformerFor<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentXmlDataSet>>().Use<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentXmlTransformer>();
For<IXmlTransformerFor<FirstDeliveryNoticeDocumentXmlDataSet>>().Use<FirstDeliveryNoticeDocumentXmlTransformer>();
For<IXmlTransformerFor<RequestToFlowMeterDocumentXmlDataSet>>().Use<RequestToFlowMeterDocumentXmlTransformer>();
// --------
// PROVIDERS: DataItem Providers
// --------
For<IDataItemProviderFor<EmployeeData>>().Use<EmployeeDataProvider>();
// --------
// PROVIDERS: Document Providers
// --------
For<IDataItemProviderFor<RequestToFlowMeterDocument>>().Use<RequestToFlowMeterDocumentProvider>();
For<IDataItemProviderFor<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocument>>().Use<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentProvider>();
For<IDataItemProviderFor<FirstDeliveryNoticeDocument>>().Use<FirstDeliveryNoticeDocumentProvider>();
// --------
// COMMANDS
// --------
For<IAdminUpdateCommandFor<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocument>>().Use<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentAdminUpdateCommand>();
// -----------
// APPLICATION
// -----------
For<IMyApplication>().Use<MyApplication>()
// Instance Provider
.Setter(x => x.DistributionListProvider).Is<DistributionListProvider>()
.Setter(x => x.AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentRecallProvider).Is<AuthorizationToFlowMeterDocumentRecallProvider>()
// Email Notifications
.Setter(x => x.ApprovalToFlowEmailNotification).Is<ApprovalToFlowEmailNotification>()
.Setter(x => x.DenialToFlowEmailNotification).Is<DenialToFlowEmailNotification>()
.Setter(x => x.ApprovalToFlowRecalledEmailNotification).Is<ApprovalToFlowRecalledEmailNotification>()
.Setter(x => x.RequestToFlowEmailNotification).Is<RequestToFlowEmailNotification>()
.Setter(x => x.FirstDeliveryNoticeEmailNotification).Is<FirstDeliveryNoticeEmailNotification>();
}
Upvotes: 1
Views: 311
Reputation: 247098
With the [SetterProperty]
attribute, StructureMap will try to build and attach a value for the property as part of object construction.
However it is the setter attribute that requires a default implementation as it cannot determine which implementation is intended to be used when there are multiple implementations or especially if a default implementation was not added.
With RequestToFlowEmailNotification.DistributionListProvider
the container did not know which implementation to use.
To override this behavior, use inline setter configuration for RequestToFlowEmailNotification.DistributionListProvider
//...
.Setter(x => x.RequestToFlowEmailNotification)
.Is<RequestToFlowEmailNotification>(_ =>
_.Setter(d => d.DistributionListProvider)
.Is<DistributionListProvider>()); //<<-- change to which ever one is needed
Note the chaining of the Setter
configuration in order to set up RequestToFlowEmailNotification
and then the inner DistributionListProvider
Upvotes: 2