Reputation: 309
Which of the following AWS services is more suitable for storing static files used by a CDN that are accessed frequently?
EC2 S3 Glacier ElastiCache RDS
Upvotes: 0
Views: 2786
Reputation: 341
This is a general question, so I am going to give a general answer. I would highly recommend reading the documentation for each of these AWS services.
S3: https://aws.amazon.com/s3/
EC2: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/
Glacier: https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/
ElastiCache: https://aws.amazon.com/elasticache/
RDS: https://aws.amazon.com/rds/
All of these could be used to some extent (though ineffectively), but the use case you describe is what S3 does best. Good luck!
Upvotes: 4
Reputation: 12213
Use Simple Storage Service
AKA S3
. Add a CloudFront
distribution in front of it. For better security, use Pre-Signed
URLs.
Upvotes: 5