Reputation: 127
Below is the swapping function which swap values lesser than 10 in a list
swapFun <- function(x, n = 10){
inx <- which(x < n)
x[sample(inx)] <- x[inx]
x
}
For example, the original list is 1, 2, 3, 10, 4, 11.
After swapping by sampling , this list may be 2, 1, 4, 10, 3, 11 or 1, 3, 2, 10, 4, 11.
But I want to swap each value lesser than 10 to a different value lesser than 10.
For example, the first outcome (ie 2, 1, 4, 10, 3, 11) is what I want because each value lesser than 10 has been swapped to a different value lesser than 10.
However the second outcome (ie 1, 3, 2, 10, 4, 11.) is not what I want because 1 and 4 have not been swapped to a different value lesser than 10.
If there are no feasible solution, just print 'no feasible solution'
Any suggestions? Many thanks.
Upvotes: 6
Views: 143
Reputation: 51998
You are looking for a derangement of the values less than 10. By the theory of derangements, approximately 1/e (37%) of randomly chosen permutations are derangements, so a hit or miss approach is reasonable, with an important caveat.
There might be repetitions among the items less than n
. Not all permutations of those items are distinguishable, so not all derangements of the items look like derangements: swapping two 2s with each other (for example) is in some sense a derangement, but it wouldn't look like a derangement. The 1/e
heuristic applies to raw permutations of positions, not distinguishable permutations of values. If the number of repetitions is high, it might take longer than 1/e would suggest. If in your use-case the performance isn't satisfactory, you would need to replace sample()
in the function definitions by a more sophisticated function that picks random distinguishable permutations.
As far as feasibility goes, there will be a feasible solution so long as the most common element less than n
doesn't account for more than 50% of the items less than n
derangement <- function(x){
if(max(table(x)) > length(x)/2) return(NA)
while(TRUE){
y <- sample(x)
if(all(y != x)) return(y)
}
}
swapFun <- function(x, n = 10){
inx <- which(x < n)
y <- derangement(x[inx])
if(length(y) == 1) return(NA)
x[inx] <- y
x
}
For example,
> set.seed(10)
> swapFun(c(1,2,10,4,11,2,12))
[1] 2 4 10 2 11 1 12
> swapFun(c(2,2,10,4,11,2,12))
[1] NA
Note that no valid derangement has length 1, but NA
has length 1, so testing the length of y
is an effective way to test if it is possible to derange the values. The function returns NA
if no derangement of the values less than n exists. You can test for NA and print "No feasible solutions" if you want
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 469
This function gives you all the unique permutations for the numbers < m while keeping the positions of numbers >= m the same.
require(combinat)
x <- c(1,2,10,4,11,2,12)
m <- 10
swapFun <- function(x, m){
# determine positions of values to be permutated or fixed
xi <- which(x < m)
xj <- which(x >= m)
# make permuations
xp <- do.call(rbind, permn(x[xi]))
# make matrix with permutated and fixed values
xn <- matrix(nrow = nrow(xp), ncol = length(x))
xn[ ,xi] <- xp
xn[ ,xj] <- sort(rep(x[xj],nrow(xp)))
# delete duplicates
d <- !duplicated(apply(xn, 1, paste, collapse = "_"))
xn <- xn[d,]
return(xn)
}
swapFun(x,m)
> swapFun(x,m)
[,1] [,2] [,3] [,4] [,5] [,6] [,7]
[1,] 1 2 10 4 11 2 12
[2,] 1 2 10 2 11 4 12
[3,] 2 1 10 2 11 4 12
[4,] 2 1 10 4 11 2 12
[5,] 1 4 10 2 11 2 12
[6,] 4 1 10 2 11 2 12
[7,] 4 2 10 1 11 2 12
[8,] 2 4 10 1 11 2 12
[9,] 2 4 10 2 11 1 12
[10,] 4 2 10 2 11 1 12
[11,] 2 2 10 4 11 1 12
[12,] 2 2 10 1 11 4 12
Upvotes: 1