Kayser
Reputation: 6694
Hudson/Jenkins vs Cruise Control vs Luntbuild vs Continuum
I am searching a suitable Continuous Integration tool.
- We have Java and Java EE projects.
- Some of the projects are Maven projects
- We use Subversion/SVN
- Some of the projects have many modules
I searched a little and found these tools as recommended.
Which continuous integration tool would you recommend?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 3030
Answers (1)
omermuhammed
Reputation: 7385
I have used and setup CC and Hudson so I will speak for only these two. Hudson is easier to setup I would like to think, CruiseControl is about 25% slower. But between both of them I have personal preference for CruiseControl as I found it very easy to extend it to make an online release system for production releases.
Having said that, I see a lot more people use Hudson, and it has enough plugins to support any kind of need you may have.
Upvotes: 2
Related Questions
- buildbot vs hudson/jenkins for C++ continuous integration
- What is the difference between Hudson and CruiseControl for Java projects?
- Hudson or Jenkins for Java/.Net continuous integration?
- Comparison of Hudson, CDash, CruisonControl, TeamCity for Continuous Integration / Builder
- Experience with Hudson - Building matrix project
- Is Hudson a mature continuous integration tool now?
- Alternative build manager to Hudson
- Please help with choosing CI build tool
- Should I use CruiseControl or write my own build software?
- Choosing between Hudson and CruiseControl for the long term