Reputation: 6548
I am having trouble understanding the behavior of the following XML schema:
<xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xsd:element name="rootnode">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:choice minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="2">
<xsd:element name="e1" minOccurs="1" maxOccurs="2"/>
<xsd:element name="e2" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xsd:choice>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:schema>
I expected at least one instance of either element <e1>
or <e2>
be required as a child of <rootnode>
. Despite my expectations, an empty <rootnode>
will validate against this schema:
> xmllint --schema test.xsd empty.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rootnode>
</rootnode>
empty.xml validates
If I change the minOccurs
attribute of element e2
to something other than "0"
, I get the behavior I originally expected.
It seems as though the mere absence of element <e2>
counts as an occurrence of the xsd:choice
in my example.
If this is the case, then how come this infinite number of occurrences does not violate the maxOccurs
limit in my xsd:choice
?
Upvotes: 38
Views: 24017
Reputation: 945
Here are the allowable combinations
Two choices:
e1 (1 - 2) + e1 (1 - 2) = e1 x (2 - 4), or
e1 (1 - 2) + e2 (0 - 1), or
e2 (0 - 1) + e1 (1 - 2), or
e2 (0 - 1) + e2 (0 - 1) = e2 (0 - 2)
One choice (but no new outcomes):
e1 (1-2), or
e2 (0-1)
e1e1, e1e1e1, e1e1e1e1
e1, e1e2, e1e1e2
e2e1, e2e1e1
empty, e2, e2e2
Note that choice[min=2 max=2] would have produced the same set of valid combinations.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 163322
I tell you you can go to the shops at least once and at most twice, and each time you have a choice of what to buy: you can buy apples (either one apple or two apples), or you can buy oranges (either no oranges or one orange).
It's entirely possible that you will choose to go to the shops twice and on each occasion to buy no oranges. So you come back with nothing.
Upvotes: 105