Reputation: 130
I am using Koin di library in my project. Version of lib is 1.0.0-RC-1.
My module:
val appModule = module {
scope("UserScope") { UserToaster(androidContext()) as Toaster }
scope("AnonScope") { AnonToaster(androidContext()) as Toaster }
}
I started koin in my Application class and created scope:
override fun onCreate() {
super.onCreate()
startKoin(this, listOf(appModule))
getKoin().getOrCreateScope("AnonScope")
}
And next I tried to inject implementation of Toaster from current scope to variable in Activity. Here the code:
private val toaster: Toaster by inject(scope = "AnonScope")
After this I got an error:
Caused by: org.koin.error.DependencyResolutionException: Multiple definitions found for type 'interface com.example.nkirilov.playground.Toaster (Kotlin reflection is not available)' - Koin can't choose between :
Scope [name='UserScope',class='com.example.nkirilov.playground.Toaster']
Scope [name='AnonScope',class='com.example.nkirilov.playground.Toaster']
Check your modules definition, use inner modules visibility or definition names.
I do not understand why this does not work (If use single with different names - it will work). Is that koin bug? How to avoid this error?
Upvotes: 6
Views: 5108
Reputation: 854
I implemented it like this
Module:
val navigationModule = module {
scope(DI.APP_SCOPE) { ClassA().create }
scope(DI.APP_SCOPE) { get(scopeId = DI.APP_SCOPE).classB }
scope(DI.APP_SCOPE) { get(scopeId = DI.APP_SCOPE).classC }
}
val authModule = module {
scope(DI.AUTH_SCOPE) { ClassA.create(ChildClassB(get(scopeId = DI.APP_SCOPE))) }
scope(DI.AUTH_SCOPE) { get(scopeId = DI.AUTH_SCOPE).classB }
scope(DI.AUTH_SCOPE) { get(scopeId = DI.AUTH_SCOPE).classC }
}
Main Activity:
private val classC: ClassC by inject(scope = getKoin().getOrCreateScope(APP_SCOPE))
AuthActivity:
private val classC: ClassC by inject(scope = getKoin().getOrCreateScope(DI.AUTH_SCOPE))
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 91
your definitions have the same name in Koin. Current version (~1.0.*) avoid you to specify which scope to use, by automating resolving a type and it's session id.
Can you avoid describe your definitions with same type, like:
val appModule = module {
scope("UserScope") { UserToaster(androidContext()) }
scope("AnonScope") { AnonToaster(androidContext()) }
}
Else we would need a feature to specify which scope to use when resolving a type. You would resolve it with:
val userScope = getScope("UserScope")
get<Toaster>(scope = userScope)
Upvotes: 0