CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javainheritancetypeserasure
user2303321
user2303321

Reputation: 327

How to use Inherited Methods using Type Erasure?

I'm trying to use type erasure in order to access the inherited methods of the general type.

I have a parent class, Space, and child classes, Scalar, Vector, Mapping, etc. I want an interface, Function, for which I can specify the domain and range among the various child classes of Space.

The class, Mapping, contains the interface, Function, and should be able to access it through the method, Of.

If the programmer wants to take the mapping of a double, i.e.,

Mapping map = new Mapping(...);
Scalar answer = map(0.0);

then I want the function, Of, to convert the double to a Scalar and then pass it on to the interface, Function.

public class Mapping<Domain extends Space, Range extends Space> extends Space{

    protected Function<Domain,Range> function;

    public Range of(Double point){
        return function.of(new Scalar(point)); //Error, the type <Domain,Range> is not applicable to type Scalar.
    }
}

public interface Function<Domain extends Space,Range extends Space>{
    public Range of(Domain point);
}

public class Scalar extends Space {
    protected double value=0.0;
    public Scalar(double in){
        value = in;
    }

Eclipse recommends casting Scalar to Domain, but since Domain extends Space, as does Scalar, shouldn't a Scalar be acceptable to pass to Function?

Edit:

I have constructors for each child class that take in Scalar as an argument, e.g., Public Vector(Scalar x){...}. I want Mapping to take in a double, convert it to a Scalar, and then if the Domain of the function is, for example, a Vector, then I would like the Vector(Scalar x) constructor called.

Ideally, I would just have a parent constructor of a double:

public Range of(Double point){
    return function.of(new Domain(point));
}

But I can't implement a generic type. This is the problem I'm trying to work around. Is there a better way of doing this?

Upvotes: 1

Views: 111

Answers (1)

Abraham Ciokler
Abraham Ciokler

Reputation: 221

With the current definition of Function interface, the method of can only take in an object of type Scalar. The Mapping class won't compile because inheritance only work in one direction. Scalar inherits from Space, but the Space doesn't inherit from Scalar. So you can't expect the Mapping class to be able to pass a Space object to the method in Function.

The design of your classes need some refactoring, but it's not clear what you want to achieve, because the design is conflicting with itself.

For example, the Function interface only deals with Scalar values. Meanwhile, the Mapping class is expected to take in any domain of Space type (Vector, Scalar, etc..). If you want your Mapping class to accept any Space type, then you can't limit its Function to only accept Scalar.

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions