CODEWITHSUNDEEP
c++constants
Sid Zhang
Sid Zhang

Reputation: 972

about "int const *p" and "const int *p "

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
    int i1 = 0;
    int i2 = 10;

    const int *p = &i1;
    int const *p2 = &i1;
    const int const *p3 = &i1;

    p = &i2;
    p2 = &i2;
    p3 = &i2;

    cout << *p << endl
        << *p2 <<endl
        << *p3 <<endl;
    return 0;
}

The code can be compiled with both VC6.0 and VC2010. But I have questions as blow:

const int *p = &i1;

It means what the "p" points can not be modified,but p can not be modified,am I right? so

p = &i2;

this line can be complied,yes?

This line:

int const *p2 = &i1;

In my mind,this means p2 can not be modified while what p2 points can be changed, am i right? Why the

p2 = &i2;

can be compiled?

About this line:

const int const *p3 = &i1;

p3 = &i2;

Oh,god... I am crazy. I have no idea why this line can be compiled with no error... Can any body help me?

Another code which confused me is here:

class Coo2    
{      
 public:     

 Coo2() : p(new int(0)) {}    

 ~Coo2() {delete p;}    


    int const * getP() const   
    {      
         *p = 1;         
         return this->p;      
    }      

 private:    
      int* p;    
};

why this code can be compiled? In

int const * getP() const

I have change the value or *p !

Upvotes: 8

Views: 17397

Answers (9)

RecharBao
RecharBao

Reputation: 371

Here is a pointer to a constant:

  const int* p;

The following statement is illegal, because it attempts to change the value of a constant:

  *p = 3;

But this one is legal, because the pointer itself is not a constant:

  p = &x;

On the other hand, this declaration shows a constant pointer to a variable.

  int* const p;

In that case, the following statement is legal, as the variable can be changed:

  *p = 3;

but this one is not, because it attempts to change the value of a constant.

  p = &x;

Reference link:http://faculty.cs.niu.edu/~freedman/241/const-ptrs.txt

Upvotes: 2

Mike Makuch
Mike Makuch

Reputation: 1838

Succinctly; each combination of read/write int & pointer;

int main() {

  int a,b;

  int* w;                       // read/write int, read/write pointer
  w= &b;                        // good
  *w= 1;                        // good

  int* const x = &a;            // read only pointer, read/write int 
  // x = &b;                    // compilation error
  *x = 0;                       // good

  int const * y;                // read/write ptr, read only int 
  const int * y2;               // "    "    "
  y = &a;                       // good
  // *y = 0;                    // compilation error
  y2 = &a;                      // good
  // *y2 = 0;                   // compilation error

  int const * const z = &a;     // read only ptr and read only int 
  const int * const z2 = &b;    // "    "   "   "   
  // *z = 0;                    // compilation error
  // z = &a;                    // compilation error
  // *z2 = 0;                   // compilation error
  // z2 = &a;                   // compilation error

}

Upvotes: 1

Ali
Ali

Reputation: 101

Here we consider 4 types of pointers declarations:

  1. int * w; It means that w is a pointer to an integer type value. We can modify both the pointer and its content. If we initialize w while declaration as below: int * w = &a;
    Then, both of below operations are viable:
    w = &b;(true)
    *w = 1;(true)

  2. int * const x;
    It means x is a constant pointer that points to an integer type value. If we initialize x while declaration as below:
    int * const x = &a;
    Then, we cannot do: x = &b;(wrong) because x is a constant pointer and cannot be modified.
    However, it is possible to do: *x = 1;(true), because the content of x is not constant.

  3. int const * y; //both mean the same
    const int * y;
    It means that y is a pointer that points to a constant integer value. If we initialize y while declaration as below:
    int const * y = &a;
    Then, it is possible to do: y=&b;(true) because y is a non-constant pointer that can point to anywhere.
    However, we cannot do: *y=1;(wrong) because the variable that y points to is a constant variable and cannot be modified.

  4. int const * const z; //both mean the same
    const int * const z;
    It means that z is a constant pointer that points to a constant integer value. If we initialize z while declaration as below:
    int const * const z = &a;
    Therefore, non of below operations are viable:
    z = &b;(wrong)
    *z = 1;(wrong)

Upvotes: 10

Mahesh
Mahesh

Reputation: 34625

With the help of pointer, you can actually do two things.

  1. You can change the data it is pointing to but cannot point to a different memory location.
  2. You can point it to a different memory location but cannot change the data it is pointing to.

Now, when you say, int const* ptr or int const* ptr, it falls under first category. It's same as - 

const int num = 5; // Both mean the same.
int const num = 5;

To, actually not able to change to a different location, i.e., pointer to a constant location but be able to modify the data, the semantics should be int* const. Since the content of the pointer is a constant, it should be initialized while declaration.

int num = 5;

int* const ptr; // Wrong
ptr = &num; // Wrong

int* const ptr = &num;
*ptr = 100;

However, there is a third kind. Constant pointer to a constant location, which can neither point to a different memory location nor change the data it is pointing to. ( i.e., const int* const )

And now answering the questions, the first two can be compiled because they are not pointing to constant locations. So, they can be modified at later stages too. 

const int const *p3 = &i1;
p3 = &i2;  // Wrong

In the above snippet, p3 is a constant pointer to a constant location. So, it cannot be modified.

const at the end of a member function says it is not going to change the state of the object. When you say *p = 1;, you are not changing the state of the object. p still points to the same memory location. This is not allowed to do -

int const * Coo2::getP() const   
{      
     *p = 1;   // State of `p` is still not modified.
     p = new int ; // Error: Changing the memory location to which p points.
                   //        This is what changing the state of object mean and       
                   //        is not allowed because of `const` keyword at the end of function
     return this->p;      
}

Hope, now you understand why the program compiles :)

Upvotes: 5

Jerry Coffin
Jerry Coffin

Reputation: 490338

The two are exactly the same. What matters is the position of the qualifier relative to the asterisk (*):

int const *p; // normal pointer to const int
const int *p; // ditto

int *const p; // const pointer to normal int (rarely useful)

int const * const p; // const pointer to const int

Upvotes: 2

Sarfaraz Nawaz
Sarfaraz Nawaz

Reputation: 361612

const int *p = &i1;
int const *p2 = &i1;

These both declare non-const pointers to const data.

That is, using p, you cannot change the data it points to. However, you can change the pointer itself, for example, by assigning as p = &i2 which is legal. But *p = 87987 is illegal, as the data p points to is const!

--

int * const p = &i1;

This declares const pointer to non-const data. That is, p=&i2 is illegal, but *p = 98789 is legal.

--

const int * const p = &i1;

This declares const pointer to const data. That is, now both p=&i2 and *p=87897 are illegal.

Upvotes: 2

Hassan Syed
Hassan Syed

Reputation: 20485

int const * p; and const int * p are the same. It is when the const comes after the * that the semantics of the expression change.

I know, it's crazy.

Upvotes: 4

Keith Nicholas
Keith Nicholas

Reputation: 44308

int const * is the same as const int *

Upvotes: 1

wheaties
wheaties

Reputation: 35980

No, the const keyword before the * means that the variable you are pointing to is a "const" variable and only it can not be modified.

  1. If you want a pointer that can't be reassigned then you need to declare it as Foo* const p = &bar;
  2. If you want a pointer that points to a "const" object that can't be reassigned declare it as const Foo* const p = &bar

It is perfectly fine to have a pointer of const int* foo be assigned to a pointer of const int* const bar just like it is fine to have an int's value assigned to a const int. Think of it in the same manner.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions