Reputation: 2418
When calling QMetaMethod::invoke()
on a method that contains default arguments, the invoke fails.
class MyClass : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
Q_INVOKABLE MyClass() : QObject(nullptr){}
public slots:
int MyMethod(int a = 0)
{
return a*2;
}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
MyClass* object = new MyClass();
QMetaObject *metaObject = object->metaObject();
for(int i=metaObject->methodOffset(); i<metaObject->methodCount(); i++)
{
if(metaObject->method(i).name() == "MyMethod")
{
int returnVal;
//returns false
metaObject->method(i).invoke(object,
Qt::DirectConnection,
Q_RETURN_ARG(int, returnVal));
break;
}
}
return a.exec();
}
If I pass an int as the first argument, then it runs fine. Is there any way to retrieve the default values of the arguments for the method so that way I can pass those instead of passing nothing?
I was about to manually store the defaults within the class for each method, but this is an ugly hack.
Thanks for your time.
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2112
Reputation: 243993
If you review the generated .moc you see the following:
void MyClass::qt_static_metacall(QObject *_o, QMetaObject::Call _c, int _id, void **_a)
{
if (_c == QMetaObject::InvokeMetaMethod) {
MyClass *_t = static_cast<MyClass *>(_o);
Q_UNUSED(_t)
switch (_id) {
case 0: { int _r = _t->MyMethod((*reinterpret_cast< int(*)>(_a[1])));
if (_a[0]) *reinterpret_cast< int*>(_a[0]) = std::move(_r); } break;
case 1: { int _r = _t->MyMethod();
if (_a[0]) *reinterpret_cast< int*>(_a[0]) = std::move(_r); } break;
default: ;
}
}
}
As you can see there are 2 methods generated and that can be verified by printing the methods with that name:
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QMetaMethod>
#include <QDebug>
class MyClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
using QObject::QObject;
public slots:
int MyMethod(int a = 0){ return a*2;}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
MyClass object;
const QMetaObject *metaObject = object.metaObject();
for(int i=metaObject->methodOffset(); i<metaObject->methodCount(); i++)
{
QMetaMethod method = metaObject->method(i);
if(method.name() == QByteArray("MyMethod"))
qDebug()<<i<<method.name();
};
return 0;
}
#include "main.moc"
Output:
5 "MyMethod"
6 "MyMethod"
So what sets them apart? The number of parameters, so you must add a filter that is the parameterCount()
.
#include <QCoreApplication>
#include <QMetaMethod>
#include <QDebug>
class MyClass: public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
using QObject::QObject;
public slots:
int MyMethod(int a = 0){ return a*2;}
};
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
MyClass object;
const QMetaObject *metaObject = object.metaObject();
for(int i=metaObject->methodOffset(); i<metaObject->methodCount(); i++)
{
QMetaMethod method = metaObject->method(i);
if(method.name() == QByteArray("MyMethod") && method.parameterCount() == 0)
{
int returnVal;
bool status = method.invoke(&object,
Qt::DirectConnection,
Q_RETURN_ARG(int, returnVal));
Q_ASSERT(status);
qDebug()<<returnVal;
}
};
return 0;
}
#include "main.moc"
Output:
0
On the other hand if you want to avoid this kind of problems you can use QMetaObject::invokeMethod()
that makes that verification:
MyClass object;
int returnVal;
bool status = QMetaObject::invokeMethod(&object,
"MyMethod",
Qt::DirectConnection,
Q_RETURN_ARG(int, returnVal));
Q_ASSERT(status);
qDebug()<<returnVal;
Upvotes: 5