Reputation: 2351
I have a dataset which looks as follows:
# A tibble: 5,458 x 539
# Groups: country, id1 [2,729]
idstd id2 xxx id1 country year
<dbl+> <dbl> <dbl+lbl> <dbl+lbl> <chr> <dbl>
1 445801 NA NA 7 Albania 2009
2 542384 4616555 1163 7 Albania 2013
3 445802 NA NA 8 Albania 2009
4 542386 4616355 1162 8 Albania 2013
5 445803 NA NA 25 Albania 2009
6 542371 4616545 1161 25 Albania 2013
7 445804 NA NA 30 Albania 2009
8 542152 4616556 475 30 Albania 2013
9 445805 NA NA 31 Albania 2009
10 542392 4616542 1160 31 Albania 2013
The data is paneldata, but is there is no unique panel-id. The first two observations are for example respondent number 7 from Albania, but number 7 is used again for other countries. id2
however is unique. My plan is therefore to copy id2
into the NA
entry of the corresponding respondent.
I wrote the following code:
for (i in 1:nrow(df)) {
if (df$id1[i]== df$id1[i+1] & df$country[i] == df$country[i+1]) {
df$id2[i] <- df$id2[i+1]
}}
Which gives the following error:
Error in if (df$id1[i] == df1$id1[i + 1] & : missing value where TRUE/FALSE needed
It does however seem to work. As my dataset is quite large and I am not very skilled, I am reluctant to accept the solution I came up with, especially when it gives an error.
Could anyone may help explain the error to me?
In addition, is there a more efficient (for example data.table) and maybe error free way to deal with this?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 53
Reputation: 796
Can you not do something along the line:
library(tidyverse)
df %>%
group_by(country, id1) %>%
mutate(uniqueId = id2 %>% discard(is.na) %>% unique) %>%
ungroup()
Also, from looking at your loop I judge that the NA are always 1 row apart from the unique IDs, so you could also do:
df %>%
mutate(id2Lag = lag(id2),
uniqueId = ifelse(is.na(id2), id2Lag, id2) %>%
select(-id2Lag)
Upvotes: 1