CODEWITHSUNDEEP
mobileamp-html
Murad Zulfugarov
Murad Zulfugarov

Reputation: 388

Only AMP pages or non-AMP pages + AMP pages

Currently, we are trying to implement AMP to our current website. Non-AMP version is already ready and works as it supposed to be. Question is: 'which one would be better: to change all current pages to AMP or creating additional AMP pages and put canonical link to original pages?'

Upvotes: 0

Views: 146

Answers (1)

Bachcha Singh
Bachcha Singh

Reputation: 3934

There is no doubt that AMP is fast, beautiful and high-performing across devices and distribution platforms. It can run on desktop and mobile both. But AMP is basically for mobile. I think that we should run separate for desktop (non-amp) and mobile (amp).

In general we support the latest two versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Opera and UC Browser. We support desktop, phone, tablet and the web view version of these respective browsers.

Beyond that, the core AMP library and built-in elements should aim for very wide browser support and we accept fixes for all browsers with market share greater than 1 percent.

In particular, we try to maintain "it might not be perfect but isn't broken"-support for the Android 4.0 system browser and Chrome 28+ on phones.

enter image description here

Upvotes: 2

Related Questions