Reputation: 43
I have a file with some info how can I read all info?
Name names;
try (FileInputStream fileInputStream = new FileInputStream(file)) {
ObjectInputStream objectInputStream = new ObjectInputStream(fileInputStream);
names = (Name) objectInputStream.readObject();
} catch (IOException | ClassNotFoundException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
Upvotes: 3
Views: 9820
Reputation: 11949
You have several solution, all depending on the input:
You can iterate until the stream is fully consumed: I think that is the worse solution out of those I provide you. It is worse because you are checking if EOF was reached, whilst you should know when you're done (eg: your file format is wrong).
Set<Name> result = new HashSet<>();
try {
for (;;) {
result.add((Name)objectInputStream.readObject());
}
} catch (EOFException e) {
// End of stream
}
return result;
When producing the input, serialize a collection and invoke readObject()
on it. Serialization
should be able to read the collection, as long as each object implements Serializable
.
static void write(Path path, Set<Name> names) throws IOException {
try (OutputStream os = Files.newOutputStream(path);
ObjectOutputStream oos = new ObjectOutputStream(os)) {
oos.writeObject(names);
}
}
static Set<Name> read(Path path) throws IOException {
try (InputStream is = Files.newInputStream(path);
ObjectInputStream ois = new ObjectInputStream(is)) {
// WARN Files.newInputStream is not buffered; ObjectInputStream might
// be buffered (I don't remember).
return (Set<Name>) ois.readObject();
}
}
When producing the input, you can add a int
indicating the number of object to read, and iterate over it: this is useful in case where you don't really care of the collection (HashSet
). The resulting file will be smaller (because you won't have the HashSet
metadata).
int result = objectInputStream.readInt();
Name[] names = new Name[result]; // do some check on result!
for (int i = 0; i < result; ++i) {
names[i] = (Name) objectInputStream.readObject();
}
Also, Set
are good, but since they remove duplicate using hashCode()
/equals()
you may get less object if your definition of equals
/hashCode
changed after the fact (example: your Name
was case sensitive and now it is not, eg: new Name("AA").equals(new Name("aa"))
).
Upvotes: 5