Reputation:
I'm trying to put this Memmove C code to assembly and don't get the supposed result.
I'm using x86-64 assembly on xubuntu and after debugging for 2 hours, I don't see where I'm wrong.
C memmove code:
#include <stdio.h>
extern void * memmove(void *dest, void *src, size_t n);
int main () {
char str1[] = "Geeks"; // Array of size 6
char str2[] = "Quiz"; // Array of size 5
puts("str1 before memmove ");
puts(str1);
/* Copies contents of str2 to sr1 */
memmove(str1, str2, sizeof(str2));
puts("\nstr1 after memmove ");
puts(str1);
return 0;
}
/*
void * memmove(void *dest, void *src, size_t n) {
char *d = (char *) dest;
char *s = (char *) src;
if(s == d)
return dest;
if(s < d) {
//copy from back
s=s+n-1;
d=d+n-1;
while(n--) {
*d-- = *s--;
}
}
else {
//copy from front
while(n--)
*d++ = *s++;
}
return dest;
} */
Assembly code:
.globl memmove
# RDI = dest
# RSI = src
# RDX = n
# R8 = d
# R9 = s
memmove:
mov %rdi, %r8 # d = dest
mov %rsi, %r9 # s = src
jmp if_equal
if_equal:
cmp %r8, %r9 # s == d
jz retDest
ja else # s > d
jb if_s_minor # s < d
if_s_minor:
add %rdx, %r9 # s = s + n
sub $1, %r9 # s = s - 1
add %rdx, %r8 # d = d + n
sub $1, %r8 # d = d - 1
jmp while1
while1:
cmp $0, %rdx # n > 0 ?
jna retDest # if n <= 0 go to retDest
sub $1, %rdx # n--
movb (%rsi), %cl # *dst-- = *src--
movb %cl, (%rdi)
leaq -1(%r8), %r8 # *d--
leaq -1(%r9), %r9 # *s--
jmp while1
else:
jmp while2
while2:
cmp $0, %rdx # n > 0 ?
jna retDest
sub $1, %rdx # n--
movb (%rsi), %cl # *dst = *src
movb %cl, (%rdi)
leaq 1(%r8), %r8 # *d++
leaq 1(%r9), %r9 # *s++
jmp while2
retDest:
mov %rdi, %rax
ret
.end
It was supposed to show "Quiz" on the second print but it shows this:
str1 before memmove Geeks
str1 after memmove Qeeks
Upvotes: 2
Views: 2019
Reputation: 39166
movb (%rsi), %cl # *dst = *src movb %cl, (%rdi) leaq 1(%r8), %r8 # *d++ leaq 1(%r9), %r9 # *s++ jmp while2
The problem here is that your code changes the %r8
and %r9
registers, but the %rdi
and %rsi
registers that are used in the actual move stay the same, thus repeating copying the same byte again and again!
Same problem of course in the while1 code.
Upvotes: 1