sharonooo
sharonooo

Reputation: 694

Nested array group-by with lodash

I have a small web-application which fetches data using API call, the response is array of reports, each report have unique id, application, type and title.

I want to map it into new object by grouping-by application and then by types as describe bellow.

Input:

[
  {
    "id": "REPORT1",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT2",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT3",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE2",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT4",
    "application": "APP2",
    "type": "TYPE3",
    "title": ""
  }
]

Desired output:

{
  "APP1": {
    "TYPE1": [
      {
        "id": "REPORT1",
        "application": "APP1",
        "type": "TYPE1",
        "title": ""
      },
      {
        "id": "REPORT2",
        "application": "APP1",
        "type": "TYPE1",
        "title": ""
      }
    ],
    "TYPE2": [
      {
        "id": "REPORT3",
        "application": "APP1",
        "type": "TYPE2",
        "title": ""
      }
    ]
  },
  "APP2": {
    "TYPE3": [
      {
        "id": "REPORT4",
        "application": "APP2",
        "type": "TYPE3",
        "title": ""
      }
    ]
  }
}

With loadash I came up with this:

const output = _(input)
  .groupBy(report => report.application)
  .value()

After group by application, I need to make another nested grouping or mapping by type but got stuck.

Upvotes: 11

Views: 12432

Answers (5)

Mostafa Sherif
Mostafa Sherif

Reputation: 1

I've written a short method to do this, check below snippet.

const groupByDeep = (collection, keys) => {
  return _.chain(collection)
    .map(item => _.map(keys, key => _.get(item, key)))
    .reduce((result, paths, idx) => {
      const items = _.get(result, paths.join('.'), []);
      _.set(result, paths.join('.'), [...items, collection[idx]]);
      return result;
    }, {})
    .value();
};

const input = [{
    "id": "REPORT1",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT2",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT3",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE2",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT4",
    "application": "APP2",
    "type": "TYPE3",
    "title": ""
  }
];

console.log(groupByDeep(input, ['application', 'type']));
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>

Upvotes: 0

Rory
Rory

Reputation: 2506

I personally found this more readable when combining _.groupBy and _.mapValues in Lodash:

var input = [{ id: "REPORT1", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE1", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT2", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE1", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT3", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE2", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT4", application: "APP2", type: "TYPE3", title: "" }]

const output = _.mapValues(_.groupBy(input, i => i.application),app => _.groupBy(app, i => i.type))

console.log(output)
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/lodash.js/4.17.21/lodash.min.js"></script>

Upvotes: 4

Nina Scholz
Nina Scholz

Reputation: 386654

You could take a dynamic approach with the wanted keys for grouping.

groups = ["application", "type"]

Then reduce the data array and the keys array and build either new objects, if necessary or with the last group an array for pushing the actual object.

This solution can be easily extended to more nested groups, if necessary.

var data = [{ id: "REPORT1", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE1", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT2", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE1", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT3", application: "APP1", type: "TYPE2", title: "" }, { id: "REPORT4", application: "APP2", type: "TYPE3", title: "" }],
    groups = ["application", "type"],
    grouped = data.reduce((r, o) => {
        groups
            .reduce((group, key, i, { length }) =>
                group[o[key]] = group[o[key]] || (i + 1 === length ? [] : {}), r)
            .push(o);

        return r;
    }, {});
    
console.log(grouped);
.as-console-wrapper { max-height: 100% !important; top: 0; }

Upvotes: 6

Prasanna
Prasanna

Reputation: 4636

es6, object spreading and reduce makes it so simpler

const input = [
  {
    "id": "REPORT1",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT2",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT3",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE2",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT4",
    "application": "APP2",
    "type": "TYPE3",
    "title": ""
  }
]


const output = input.reduce((acc, item) => ({
  ...acc,
  [item.application]: {
    ...acc[item.application],
    [item.type]: [
      ...(acc[item.application] && acc[item.application][item.type] || []),
      item,
    ]
  }
}), {})

console.log(output)

Upvotes: 7

Dacre Denny
Dacre Denny

Reputation: 30360

This can be implemented quite easily without lodash via the Array#reduce() function.

For details on how this is achieved, see the comments in code snippets source code:

var input = [{
    "id": "REPORT1",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT2",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE1",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT3",
    "application": "APP1",
    "type": "TYPE2",
    "title": ""
  },
  {
    "id": "REPORT4",
    "application": "APP2",
    "type": "TYPE3",
    "title": ""
  }
];

var output = input.reduce((result, item) => {

  // Get app object corresponding to current item from result (or insert if not present)
  var app = result[item.application] = result[item.application] || {};

  // Get type array corresponding to current item from app object (or insert if not present)
  var type = app[item.type] = app[item.type] || [];

  // Add current item to current type array
  type.push(item);

  // Return the result object for this iteration
  return result;

}, {});

console.log(output);
.as-console-wrapper {
height:100% !important;
max-height:unset !important;
}

Upvotes: 13

Related Questions