Reputation: 7549
It's been a while since I've used lambda expressions or LINQ and am wondering how I would do the following (I know I can use a foreach loop, this is just out of curiosity) using both methods.
I have an array of string paths (does it make a difference if it's an array or list here?) from which I want to return a new list of just the filenames.
i.e. using a foreach loop it would be:
string[] paths = getPaths();
List<string> listToReturn = new List<string>();
foreach (string path in paths)
{
listToReturn.add(Path.GetFileName(path));
}
return listToReturn;
How would I do the same thing with both lambda and LINQ?
EDIT: In my case, I'm using the returned list as an ItemsSource for a ListBox (WPF) so I'm assuming it's going to need to be a list as opposed to an IEnumerable?
Upvotes: 5
Views: 39715
Reputation: 273179
Your main tool would be the .Select() method.
string[] paths = getPaths();
var fileNames = paths.Select(p => Path.GetFileName(p));
does it make a difference if it's an array or list here?
No, an array also implements IEnumerable<T>
Note that this minimal approach involves deferred execution, meaning that fileNames
is an IEnumerable<string>
and only starts iterating over the source array when you get elements from it.
If you want a List (to be safe), use
string[] paths = getPaths();
var fileNames = paths.Select(p => Path.GetFileName(p)).ToList();
But when there are many files you might want to go the opposite direction (get the results interleaved, faster) by also using a deferred execution source:
var filePaths = Directory.EnumerateFiles(...); // requires Fx4
var fileNames = filePaths.Select(p => Path.GetFileName(p));
It depends on what you want to do next with fileNames
.
Upvotes: 18
Reputation: 7600
listToReturn = paths.ToList().Select(p => Path.GetFileName(p));
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 57210
It's just:
var listToReturn = getPaths().Select(x => Path.GetFileName(x)).ToList();
As already stated in other answers, if you don't actually need a List<string>
you can omit the ToList()
and simply return IEnumerable<string>
(for example if you just need to iterate it, IEnumerable<>
is better because avoids the creation of an other list of strings)
Also, given that Select()
method takes a delegate, and there's an implicit conversion between method groups and delegates having the same signature, you can skip the lambda and just do:
getPaths().Select(Path.GetFileName)
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 1500055
I think by "LINQ" you really mean "a query expression" but:
// Query expression
var listToReturn = (from path in paths
select Path.GetFileName(path)).ToList();
// Extension methods and a lambda
var listToReturn = paths.Select(path => Path.GetFileName(path))
.ToList();
// Extension methods and a method group conversion
var listToReturn = paths.Select(Path.GetFileName)
.ToList();
Note how the last one works by constructing the projection delegate from a method group, like this:
Func<string, string> projection = Path.GetFileName;
var listToReturn = paths.Select(projection).ToList();
(Just in case that wasn't clear.)
Note that if you don't need to use this as a list - if you just want to iterate over it, in other words - you can drop the ToList()
call from each of these approaches.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 14786
You could do it like this:
return getPaths().Select(Path.GetFileName);
Upvotes: 4