Reputation: 53
I want to prove that the loop in this procedure will terminate using the variant ( bound function)
the variant will be I
and the lower bound is 0
(I: = 0)
on each repetition, the size of I
will decrease till reached to lower bound 0
How can I prove that I
will decrease in this loop?
procedure Find
(Key: Integer;
Data : in MyArray;
Index: out Integer;
Found: out Boolean)
--# post (Found -> Data(Index) = Key);
is
I: Integer;
begin
I := 0;
Found := False;
loop
--# assert (I >= 0) and
--# (I <= Data'Last + 1) and
--# (Found -> Data(I) = Key);
exit when (I > Data 'Last) or Found;
if(Data(I)) = Key
then
Found := True;
else
I:= I + 1;
end if;
end loop;
Index := I;
end Find;
Upvotes: 1
Views: 239
Reputation: 5941
I would use a bounded loop construct (for loop) to iterate over the array. A for loop handles array bounds and empty arrays more easily. This works for me in GNAT CE 2018 (using SPARK 2014 here):
package Foo with SPARK_Mode => On is
type MyArray is array (Integer range <>) of Integer;
procedure Find
(Key : in Integer;
Data : in MyArray;
Index : out Integer;
Found : out Boolean)
with
Post => (if Found then Data (Index) = Key);
end Foo;
and
package body Foo with SPARK_Mode => On is
----------
-- Find --
----------
procedure Find
(Key : in Integer;
Data : in MyArray;
Index : out Integer;
Found : out Boolean)
is
begin
Found := False;
Index := Data'First;
for I in Data'Range loop
if Data (I) = Key then
Found := True;
Index := I;
end if;
pragma Loop_Invariant
(Index in Data'Range);
pragma Loop_Invariant
(if Found then Data (Index) = Key else Data (Index) /= Key);
exit when Found;
end loop;
end Find;
end Foo;
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 3358
If I write this in typical Ada idiom I get
package SPARK_Proof is
type Integer_List is array (Positive range <>) of Integer;
type Find_Result (Found : Boolean := False) is record
case Found is
when False =>
null;
when True =>
Index : Positive;
end case;
end record;
function Match_Index (Value : Integer; List : Integer_List) return Find_Result;
end SPARK_Proof;
package body SPARK_Proof is
function Match_Index (Value : Integer; List : Integer_List) return Find_Result is
-- Empty
begin -- Match_Index
Search : for I in List'Range loop
if Value = List (I) then
return (Found => True, Index => I);
end if;
end loop Search;
return (Found => False);
end Match_Index;
end SPARK_Proof;
This is shorter and clearer. I don't know if it's any easier to prove with SPARK.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 25491
I’m not sure what you mean by 'variant' and 'bound function', and I don’t have access to your version of SPARK.
In SPARK 2014, with GNAT CE 2018, this proves (after much pain, maybe I should work through some of the SPARK tutorials) without any loop invariants.
I think I could get away without Supported_Range
if I ran the loop in reverse.
I’d’ve liked to replace the True
in the postcondition with (for all D of Data => D /= Key)
, but I’ll leave it at that.
I realise this doesn’t answer your question, sorry.
package Memo with SPARK_Mode is
subtype Supported_Range is Natural range 0 .. Natural'Last - 1;
type My_Array is array (Supported_Range range <>) of Integer;
procedure Find
(Key : Integer;
Data : My_Array;
Index : out Integer;
Found : out Boolean)
with
Pre => Data'Length >= 1,
Post => ((Found and then Index in Data'Range and then Data (Index) = Key)
or else True);
end Memo;
package body Memo with SPARK_Mode is
procedure Find
(Key : Integer;
Data : My_Array;
Index : out Integer;
Found : out Boolean)
is
subtype Possible_J is Integer range Data’Range;
J : Possible_J;
begin
J := Possible_J'First;
Index := -1; -- have to initialize with something
Found := False;
loop
if Data (J) = Key
then
Found := True;
Index := J;
exit;
else
exit when J = Data'Last;
J := J + 1;
end if;
end loop;
end Find;
end Memo;
Upvotes: 3