Reputation: 452
My goal is a slideshow of background images with HTML/CSS/JS. Many solutions that I've found promote something like this:
my_recursion();
function my_recursion () {
// cycle the Background image ...
setTimeout(my_recursion, 3000);
}
Am I wrong to assume that this is bad style? I would expect that at e.g. cycle 1000 all the other 999 instances of my_recursion are still open / on the stack? Doesn't this create and infinite stack which consumes more and more memory?
Or is there some sort of intelligence involved which does something like "if a function calls itself at the end, the (n-1)th function is destroyed including all variables that were assigned inside of it"?
Upvotes: 6
Views: 1416
Reputation: 569
Adding to https://stackoverflow.com/a/54443904/11022136. Wanted to give some evidence. Ran the following on node 14.
test.js:
let i = 10;
const canThisOverflow = () => {
i--;
console.trace();
if (i > 0) setTimeout(canThisOverflow, 1);
}
canThisOverflow();
Output: Stack size does not increase
Trace
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test.js:4:10)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test.js:7:1)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1092:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:928:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:769:14)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:72:12)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47
Trace
at Timeout.canThisOverflow [as _onTimeout] (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test.js:4:10)
at listOnTimeout (internal/timers.js:554:17)
at processTimers (internal/timers.js:497:7)
Trace
at Timeout.canThisOverflow [as _onTimeout] (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test.js:4:10)
at listOnTimeout (internal/timers.js:554:17)
at processTimers (internal/timers.js:497:7)
test2.js:
let i = 10;
const canThisOverflow = () => {
i--;
console.trace();
if (i > 0) canThisOverflow();
}
canThisOverflow();
Output: Stack size increases
Trace
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:4:10)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:7:1)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1092:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:928:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:769:14)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:72:12)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47
Trace
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:4:10)
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:5:13)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:7:1)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1092:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:928:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:769:14)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:72:12)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47
Trace
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:4:10)
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:5:13)
at canThisOverflow (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:5:13)
at Object.<anonymous> (/Users/arjunmalik/Shipsy/query-builder/test2.js:7:1)
at Module._compile (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1063:30)
at Object.Module._extensions..js (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:1092:10)
at Module.load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:928:32)
at Function.Module._load (internal/modules/cjs/loader.js:769:14)
at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (internal/modules/run_main.js:72:12)
at internal/main/run_main_module.js:17:47
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 135357
In your question, your function does not have any parameters. In a real implementation, I hope you plan to use them.
const cycleBackground = (elem, bgs = [], ms = 1e3, i = 0) =>
( elem.setAttribute ('style', bgs[i])
, setTimeout
( cycleBackground // function to schedule
, ms // when to schedule, ms from now
, elem // user-specified element to change
, bgs // user-specified backgrounds
, ms // user-specified delay
, (i + 1) % bgs.length // next background index
)
)
const backgrounds =
[ "background-color: red;"
, "background-image: linear-gradient(45deg, cyan 0%, purple 75%);"
, "background-color: green;"
]
// call site
cycleBackground
( document.body // element to target
, backgrounds // list of backgrounds
, 3e3 // delay, 3 seconds
)
p {
text-align: center;
font-size: 3vw;
font-weight: bold;
color: white;
}
<p>Wait 3 seconds...</p>
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 15238
This will not result in endless stack increase, because of the way setTimeout works, and imho it is not bad style.
setTimeout
does not guarantee that code will run directly after the given timeout. Instead, after that timeout it will push the callback onto a "queue", which will be processed when the stack is empty. So it will only run when my_recursion has returned and the stack is empty.
If a function calls itself at the end (...)
my_recursion
doesn't call itself anywhere. It just passes itself as an argument to setTimeout
. After that, it will just continue executing, return directly after, and will be popped from the stack.
This presentation explains the stack and the event queue.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 36584
The code is fine. It destroys all the variables because when you call it first time. It setTimeout()
for the next function
and at last return. You function doesnot return
the the next.
my_recursion();
function my_recursion () {
// cycle the Background image ...
setTimeout(my_recursion, 3000); //Sets timeout for next function.
//returns undefined here
}
Upvotes: 0