Reputation: 95
I have been using JsonPath
. However after an issue yesterday where I discovered that the default JsonSmartJsonProvider
didn't report an error with an invalid document at parse time, I modified my setup to use Jackson as below
public JsonPathExtractor(String document) throws DocumentFormatException
{
try
{
Configuration.setDefaults(new Configuration.Defaults()
{
private final JsonProvider jsonProvider = new JacksonJsonProvider();
private final MappingProvider mappingProvider = new JacksonMappingProvider();
@Override
public JsonProvider jsonProvider()
{
return jsonProvider;
}
@Override
public MappingProvider mappingProvider()
{
return mappingProvider;
}
@Override
public Set<Option> options()
{
return EnumSet.noneOf(Option.class);
}
});
// Get an object representation of the JSON to allow values to be extracted
this.document = Configuration.defaultConfiguration().jsonProvider().parse(document);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
throw new DocumentFormatException("Invalid JSON document", e);
}
}
However I see a difference in behaviour, in that if I get a path which has a few fields, they are not quoted, whereas they were when using JsonSmartJsonProvider
.
Example JSON
{
"firstName": "John",
"lastName": "Smith",
"isAlive": true,
"age": 25,
"height_cm": 167.6,
"address": {
"streetAddress": "21 2nd Street",
"city": "New York",
"state": "NY",
"postalCode": "10021-3100"
},
"phoneNumbers": [
{
"type": "home",
"number": "212 555-1234"
},
{
"type": "office",
"number": "646 555-4567"
}
],
"children": [],
"spouse": null
}
With the call:
Object obj = JsonPath.read(document, "$.phoneNumbers");
When using JacksonMappingProvider
I get
[{type=home, number=212 555-1234}, {type=office, number=646 555-4567}]
When using JsonSmartJsonProvider
I get:
[{"type":"home","number":"212 555-1234"},{"type":"office","number":"646 555-4567"}]
If I want Jackson to behave the same way, is there something else that I can configure?
Upvotes: 2
Views: 6291
Reputation: 47895
There's a difference between the way in which Jackson has handled the values and the way in which they are printed out.
When using JsonSmartJsonProvider
this line ...
JsonPath.read(parse, "$.phoneNumbers");
... returns a JSONArray
and the toString()
method - which is called when you 'print' the JSONArray
instance is smart enough to know it is dealing with JSON so it prints that state as a JSON string. For example:
[{"type":"home","number":"212 555-1234"},{"type":"office","number":"646 555-4567"}]
But when you use a JacksonJsonProvider
then this line ...
JsonPath.read(parse, "$.phoneNumbers");
... returns a List
of LinkedHashMap
and the toString()
implementation invoked when you 'print' that instance is not JSON aware so it prints this:
[{type=home, number=212 555-1234}, {type=office, number=646 555-4567}]
If you want to print JSON when using the JacksonJsonProvider
then you have to print it using something which is JSON aware. Here's an example:
String payload = "{\n" +
" \"firstName\": \"John\",\n" +
" \"lastName\": \"Smith\",\n" +
" \"isAlive\": true,\n" +
" \"age\": 25,\n" +
" \"height_cm\": 167.6,\n" +
" \"address\": {\n" +
" \"streetAddress\": \"21 2nd Street\",\n" +
" \"city\": \"New York\",\n" +
" \"state\": \"NY\",\n" +
" \"postalCode\": \"10021-3100\"\n" +
" },\n" +
" \"phoneNumbers\": [\n" +
" {\n" +
" \"type\": \"home\",\n" +
" \"number\": \"212 555-1234\"\n" +
" },\n" +
" {\n" +
" \"type\": \"office\",\n" +
" \"number\": \"646 555-4567\"\n" +
" }\n" +
" ],\n" +
" \"children\": [],\n" +
" \"spouse\": null\n" +
"}";
// this is a simpler way of declaring and using the JacksonJsonProvider
ObjectMapper objectMapper = new ObjectMapper();
Configuration conf = Configuration.builder()
.jsonProvider(new JacksonJsonProvider(objectMapper))
.build();
Object obj = JsonPath.using(conf).parse(payload).read("$.phoneNumbers");
// prints out:
// [{type=home, number=212 555-1234}, {type=office, number=646 555-4567}]
System.out.println(obj);
// prints out:
// [{"type":"home","number":"212 555-1234"},{"type":"office","number":"646 555-4567"}]
System.out.println(objectMapper.writer().writeValueAsString(obj));
Upvotes: 3